Doctor: It is wrong for medical researchers to keep their research confidential, even if the companies for which they work would rather that they do so. If research results are not shared, the development of effective medical treatments may be delayed, and thus humans may suffer unnecessarily.
Which of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the doctor's argument?
(A) Medical researchers
should never engage in any behavior that they know will cause humans to suffer. - WRONG. Bit extreme but rather more importantly not hitting the core of the argument.
(B)
If the most important moral principle is to prevent human suffering, then it is wrong for medical researchers to keep their research confidential. - WRONG. 2nd best but a trap. Takes the very thing as evidence that is supposed to be proved. Reversal situation.
(C) Medical researchers
should not keep information confidential if it is possible that sharing that information would prevent some unnecessary human suffering. - CORRECT. Slight change of language but keeps up to the mark.
(D) Medical researchers
should always attempt to develop effective medical treatments
as rapidly as they can while fulfilling their other moral obligations. - WRONG. Nice inference but not the correct answer.
(E) It is
wrong for any company to ask its medical researchers to keep their research confidential, if failure to share the research might delay development of effective medical treatments. - WRONG. For company or for researchers.
Answer C.