ds:

Question

I don't agree with the OA on this one.

gmat2me2 · Answer

From (1) we do not get sufficient information.

(x-3)*(x-2)*(x-1)>0

means all three (x-3) , (x-2) and (x-1) are positive or two of them are negetive and third is a positive. The two values which could be negetive are (x-3) , (x-2). Since (x-1) is the smallest. So we cannot infer anything.

From(2) we have x>1....But it could be 1.5 or 2 or 3 we have no clue.

From (1) and (2) we can get some value which may be greater than 3 or less than 3.....

So I would go with E

chunjuwu · Answer

Go for E (1) X > 3 or 11 insufficient combine 1 and 2, still insufficient

MA · Answer

agree with E.
from, x could be >3, >2, >1.
from ii, could be >3, >2.
togather x >>3, >2

sonaketu · Answer

Yes E, since X can be a decimal. What is the OA?

july05 · Answer

I think itâ€™s A. 

From statement 1 x has to be more than 3, since x>1, x>2 and x>3 are all in one inequality. If you put in anything less than 3, itâ€™ll be either less than 0 or equal to 0. 

Statement 2 is insufficient in itself.

FN · Answer

E it is...

1) pick a number say X=1.5 and X =4 both work! but one is 3...therefore Insuff
2) insuff

combing both insuff

E it is...there is no other possible answer...

ds:

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards