Last visit was: 10 Jul 2026, 10:31 It is currently 10 Jul 2026, 10:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Jul 2026
Posts: 111,856
Own Kudos:
826,362
 [3]
Given Kudos: 108,739
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 111,856
Kudos: 826,362
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vasu1104
Joined: 10 Feb 2023
Last visit: 10 Jul 2026
Posts: 691
Own Kudos:
377
 [2]
Given Kudos: 671
Location: Canada
Posts: 691
Kudos: 377
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
paragw
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 10 Jul 2026
Posts: 265
Own Kudos:
266
 [1]
Given Kudos: 55
Products:
Posts: 265
Kudos: 266
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GmatTest2026
Joined: 30 Jul 2019
Last visit: 10 Jul 2026
Posts: 1,650
Own Kudos:
801
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3,898
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Economics
Schools: Duke '27
GPA: 3
WE:Human Resources (Real Estate)
Products:
Schools: Duke '27
Posts: 1,650
Kudos: 801
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fact 1: Three main reservoirs have low water levels.
Fact 2: A program was initiated to reduce water usage by 20%.
Fact 3: All three reservoirs have returned to normal.
Conclusion: It all happened due to the program initiated by the officials.
Assumption: The author thinks that water returns to normal due to the program initiated by the officials.

There is a flaw in the conclusion as the author does not consider that other factors may be responsible for the increase in water level.

(A) The current water level in the reservoirs is lower than it was at the same time last year. Incorrect. It has no impact on the conclusion.

(B) Other nearby reservoirs recovered from lower water levels this year, even though those reservoirs provide water to cities that did not enact water restriction policies. Correct, as this choice tells us other alternatives could be responsible for the increase in water supply that the author fails to consider.

(C) Residents reduced their water usage for lawn maintenance significantly more than they did for washing clothes. Incorrect. No impact on the argument.

(D) Imposing stiff penalties on residents who did not conserve water would have resulted in even higher water levels in the reservoirs. Incorrect. It strengthens the argument.

(E) Water usage in the city dropped steadily during the first two weeks of the program before leveling off. Incorrect. This choice more or less favours the official's plan.

Option B
Bunuel
Earlier this year, our city’s three main reservoirs had unusually low water levels. As a result, city officials initiated a program that encouraged residents to reduce their water usage by 20 percent. Since the program was announced, the water level at all three reservoirs has returned to normal. Our city officials should be applauded for their role in preventing a crisis.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the efficacy of the officials’ program?

(A) The current water level in the reservoirs is lower than it was at the same time last year.

(B) Other nearby reservoirs recovered from lower water levels this year, even though those reservoirs provide water to cities that did not enact water restriction policies.

(C) Residents reduced their water usage for lawn maintenance significantly more than they did for washing clothes.

(D) Imposing stiff penalties on residents who did not conserve water would have resulted in even higher water levels in the reservoirs.

(E) Water usage in the city dropped steadily during the first two weeks of the program before leveling off.


User avatar
UpEel
Joined: 28 May 2026
Last visit: 10 Jul 2026
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 11
Location: India
Schools: ISB '27
GPA: 3.52
Schools: ISB '27
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option - B is the correct answer
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Jul 2026
Posts: 111,856
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 108,739
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 111,856
Kudos: 826,362
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Earlier this year, our city’s three main reservoirs had unusually low water levels. As a result, city officials initiated a program that encouraged residents to reduce their water usage by 20 percent. Since the program was announced, the water level at all three reservoirs has returned to normal. Our city officials should be applauded for their role in preventing a crisis.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the efficacy of the officials’ program?

(A) The current water level in the reservoirs is lower than it was at the same time last year.

(B) Other nearby reservoirs recovered from lower water levels this year, even though those reservoirs provide water to cities that did not enact water restriction policies.

(C) Residents reduced their water usage for lawn maintenance significantly more than they did for washing clothes.

(D) Imposing stiff penalties on residents who did not conserve water would have resulted in even higher water levels in the reservoirs.

(E) Water usage in the city dropped steadily during the first two weeks of the program before leveling off.



KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



STEP 1: IDENTIFY THE QUESTION TYPE
The question stem asks for something that reduces the likelihood that the officials’ program was effective. Thus, this is a Weaken question.

STEP 2: UNTANGLE THE STIMULUS
The city officials instituted a program that called for reduced water usage, and the water levels did return to normal. The author concludes that the water reduction program was responsible for this result.

STEP 3: PREDICT THE ANSWER
This a classic example of an unsupported cause-and-effect argument. The author assumes that the program caused the levels to return to normal and that nothing else was responsible. Your prediction should be along the lines of “something other than the program led to the increased water level.”

STEP 4: EVALUATE THE CHOICES
(B) matches this prediction. It doesn’t outright state what the other factor was. However, if other reservoirs in the area recovered without a water usage program in place, then some other factor must have been involved. (A) makes an irrelevant comparison between this year and last year. Even if last year’s levels were higher, it’s still possible that the program helped the reservoirs return to normal this year. (C) is another irrelevant comparison: as long as people reduced water usage overall, the program still could have worked. (D) suggests that there could have been a more effective plan, but that doesn’t mean that the city officials’ plan was ineffective. And the timing of the drop in water usage, in (E), does not affect the argument that the plan caused the reduction and that this reduction caused reservoir levels to rise.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7395 posts
702 posts