Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
I am so confused about how to use -ed and -ing modifier. I've learned from e-gmat that -ed can only modify Noun.
So, if the sentence has Noun phrase, for example, X of Y, -ed modifier ..... + V Can -ed modifier modify X? or it can only modify the closest Noun (Y) .. and the same will it apply to V-ing modifier ?
Thank you very much
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
refer to subject and modify the whole main clause, and so, work and an adverb. in thi case, they are considered "double modifier" because they refer to a noun and in parallel modify a whole clause
learnning gmat, I realize the beauty of outside world.
inhere, Learning refer to "I" but working as an adverb of the whole main clause.
So, if the sentence has Noun phrase, for example, X of Y, -ed modifier ..... + V Can -ed modifier modify X?
Show more
Hi hiranthip, by -ed modifer, I am assuming that you mean Past Participial phrase. If that's the case, then the answer would be: Yes.
There are many such examples in official sources.
Fossils of the arm of a sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on the Greater Antilles islands.
found, a Past Participial phrase obviously does not modify sloth.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.