Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2206:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Let’s dive deep into advanced CR to ace GMAT Focus! Join this webinar to unlock the secrets to conquering Boldface and Paradox questions with expert insights and strategies. Elevate your skills and boost your GMAT Verbal Score now!
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
28 Jun 2021, 02:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
52% (01:50) correct
48%
(02:18)
wrong
based on 305
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Editorialist: Every culture furnishes the fact that family members have to be kept along in every situation and every condition of life. With this belief in mind, the family members also protect their family person incase he has done something wrong which is a crime in eyes of law. They think its morally right but this is not true.
The reasoning in the above said argument can be critisized on the grounds that this argument
A. utilizes a single type of example for the purpose of justifying a broad generalization
B. fails to consider the possibility that other moral principles would be widely recognized as overriding any obligation to protect a family member from harm
C. presumes, without providing justification, that allowing the police to arrest an innocent person assists rather than obstructs justice
D. accepts generally that there is no moral obligation to obey the law
E. generalizes that the parents mentioned in the example are not mistaken about their child's innocence
The reasoning in the above said argument can be critisized on the grounds that this argument
A. utilizes a single type of example for the purpose of justifying a broad generalization
B. fails to consider the possibility that other moral principles would be widely recognized as overriding any obligation to protect a family member from harm
C. presumes, without providing justification, that allowing the police to arrest an innocent person assists rather than obstructs justice
D. accepts generally that there is no moral obligation to obey the law
E. generalizes that the parents mentioned in the example are not mistaken about their child's innocence
09 Jul 2021, 11:27
Kudos
Bookmarks
As per my understanding, the question stem mentions that it is the editorialist argument that needs to be criticized
"The reasoning in the above said argument can be criticized on the grounds that this argument"
However, the choice B doesn't criticize the editor's argument, but rather criticizes the following argument:
"They think its morally right".
Please clarify whether the question stem is correct or am I missing something.
"The reasoning in the above said argument can be criticized on the grounds that this argument"
However, the choice B doesn't criticize the editor's argument, but rather criticizes the following argument:
"They think its morally right".
Please clarify whether the question stem is correct or am I missing something.
09 Jul 2021, 15:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
This isn’t the LSAT question it should be. The following is the actual LSAT question:
Editorialist: In all cultures, it is almost universally accepted that one has a moral duty to prevent members of one’s family from being harmed. Thus, few would deny that if a person is known by the person’s parents to be falsely accused of a crime, it would be morally right for the parents to hide the accused from the police. Hence, it is also likely to be widely accepted that it is sometimes morally right to obstruct the police in their work.
The reasoning in the editorialist’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that this argument
(A) utilizes a single type of example for the purpose of justifying a broad generalization
(B) fails to consider the possibility that other moral principles would be widely recognized as overriding any obligation to protect a family member from harm
(C) presumes, without providing justification, that allowing the police to arrest an innocent person assists rather than obstructs justice
(D) takes for granted that there is no moral obligation to obey the law
(E) takes for granted that the parents mentioned in the example are not mistaken about their child’s innocence
This is the specific PDF. See section 3, #18 https://www.lsac.org/sites/default/file ... ptjune.pdf
Posted from my mobile device
Editorialist: In all cultures, it is almost universally accepted that one has a moral duty to prevent members of one’s family from being harmed. Thus, few would deny that if a person is known by the person’s parents to be falsely accused of a crime, it would be morally right for the parents to hide the accused from the police. Hence, it is also likely to be widely accepted that it is sometimes morally right to obstruct the police in their work.
The reasoning in the editorialist’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that this argument
(A) utilizes a single type of example for the purpose of justifying a broad generalization
(B) fails to consider the possibility that other moral principles would be widely recognized as overriding any obligation to protect a family member from harm
(C) presumes, without providing justification, that allowing the police to arrest an innocent person assists rather than obstructs justice
(D) takes for granted that there is no moral obligation to obey the law
(E) takes for granted that the parents mentioned in the example are not mistaken about their child’s innocence
This is the specific PDF. See section 3, #18 https://www.lsac.org/sites/default/file ... ptjune.pdf
Posted from my mobile device
