GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 14 Aug 2018, 08:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Email

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 99

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2009, 15:53
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Email

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

Attachments

Email.jpg [ 109.03 KiB | Viewed 2263 times ]

Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 337
Location: India

### Show Tags

28 Mar 2009, 21:00
D

People still believe it so we need present tense D and E.

In E had been usage is not correct. Lets see what is OA.
Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 99

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2009, 02:43
OA is D
Manager
Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 156
Location: Mumbai

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2009, 02:45
A - "that a recepient had added" usage is wrong, "for enabling" is also wrong
B - "who had still been harboring" usage is wrong, "for enabling" is also wrong
C - it should be "who were still" , "would add" is not correct
D - this is correct, based on POE
E - "had been" is not required, otherwise this would have been better than D

What is the OA? And the rationale for it?
Intern
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 39

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2009, 22:11
why is "who" not necessary here?
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 116

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2009, 18:01
same question why "who" is not necessary?
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 337
Location: India

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2009, 18:25
Guys it's not a matter of who, it is matter of tense. All who have past tense while we need present tense here.
Check my reasoning if you have doubt I will come back again.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Re: Email &nbs [#permalink] 01 Apr 2009, 18:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.