GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 24 Apr 2018, 22:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 284
Reviews Badge
Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 Sep 2017, 19:40
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

66% (02:00) correct 34% (01:54) wrong based on 338 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict the dissemination of advanced technological knowledge that is of commercial or national-security value. Dissemination to certain countries, those that are or will be competitors or enemies, should be selectively
prohibited. There must, however, be free exchange of scientific information.

In order to act in accordance with the position above, it would be necessary to be able to rely on each of the following EXCEPT:

(A) It is possible to distinguish with confidence, despite any changes in the international environment, friendly or noncompetitive from hostile or competitive nations.

(B) In a democracy, it is not necessary that the public have detailed knowledge of the country’s advanced technology in order, for example, to make informed decisions about the direction public policy should take.

(C) In most fields of science, basic scientific research is further advanced in countries that are democracies than in countries that are not democracies.

(D) In each field of science, it is possible to distinguish scientific information from advanced technological knowledge that is of commercial or national-security value.

(E) In cases where a company that uses advanced technology is a multinational organization, it is possible to keep information about the technology from being passed across designated national boundaries.

Source: LSAT
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

We Shall Overcome... One day...


Originally posted by nahid78 on 30 Jan 2017, 20:58.
Last edited by broall on 24 Sep 2017, 19:40, edited 2 times in total.
Reformatted question
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 26 Jun 2016
Posts: 23
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Insead Sept'18
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V23
GPA: 3.25
Re: Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2017, 03:21
The question means there are 4 assumptions in 5 answers.
I negated all the answers to find the non-assumption answer. If the negation damaged the author's conclusion/position (Dissemination to certain countries, those that are or will be competitors or enemies, should be selectively prohibited. There must, however, be free exchange of scientific information) -> the answer is an assumption -> eliminate it.
The remain is the correct answer.

Thus, I eliminated A,B,D and E, leaving C. Negating C does not damage the author's position --> C is the correct answer.
Top Contributor
Director
Director
User avatar
S
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 518
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Re: Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2017, 19:20
Top Contributor
the objectives stated are -

1. Restrict the dissemination of advanced technical knowledge (and selectively prohibit dissemination to countries that are enemies or competitors)
2. Free exchange of scientific information.

This is an EXCEPT question. Each of the incorrect answer options should support the objectives.

Option A - Incorrect.
If it is indeed possible to distinguish friendly or noncompetitive countries, it is then possible to restrict the dissemination of knowledge to such countries. Supports point #1.

Option B - Incorrect.
this strengthens point #1. this means that the dissemination of advanced technical knowledge can be restricted without negative consequences.

Option C - Correct.
We are concerned with restricting the dissemination of advanced technical knowledge. We are not concerned with basic scientific research.
Also, we are not concerned with comparing democracies to undemocratic countries but rather with whether the objectives stated above can be achieved or not in any type of country. (the question says - "even in democracies").
Option C is irrelevant to the context and does not support any of the objectives. Hence, the correct answer.

Option D - Incorrect.
If this is true, then we can restrict the dissemination of advanced technical knowledge without adversely impacting the free flow of scientific information (point #2).

Option E - Incorrect.
This supports point #1. If such information cannot be restricted from being passed across national boundaries, then point #1 would be weakened.
_________________

Register for CrackVerbal MBA Achiever's Summit here -
http://crackverbal.com/mba-summit-2018

Enroll for our GMAT Trial Course here -
http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/

For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 302
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2017, 22:01
option C should be the right answer .
analyzing option C we can yourself that do we really care about democratic or not democratic countries and even it is mentioned in the stimulus that 'Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict the
dissemination of advanced technological knowledge, then it would definitely be restricted in non-democratic countries , after negating C it does not affect the stimulus in a way we want . hence C
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1963
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2017, 12:09
nahid78 wrote:
Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict the dissemination of advanced technological knowledge that is of commercial or national-security value. Dissemination to certain countries, those that are or will be competitors or enemies, should be selectively
prohibited. There must, however, be free exchange of scientific information.

In order to act in accordance with the position above, it would be necessary to be able to rely on each of the following EXCEPT:

(A) It is possible to distinguish with confidence, despite any changes in the international environment, friendly or noncompetitive from hostile or competitive nations.

(B) In a democracy, it is not necessary that the public have detailed knowledge of the country’s advanced technology in order, for example, to make informed decisions about the direction public policy should take.

(C) In most fields of science, basic scientific research is further advanced in countries that are democracies than in countries that are not democracies.

(D) In each field of science, it is possible to distinguish scientific information from advanced technological knowledge that is of commercial or national-security value.

(E) In cases where a company that uses advanced technology is a multinational organization, it is possible to keep information about the technology from being passed across designated national boundaries.

Source: LSAT


--if the info is of commercial/national-security value, it's dissemination needs to be restricted.
--if the destination is to current/future competitors/enemies, the dissemination of that type of info should be prohibited.
--but there must be free exchange of scientific info.

(A), (D), (E) can be quickly eliminated as they are required for the principle to follow.

(C) is irrelevant. We don't care if some research is more advanced in one country than another, we only care if they have commercial/national-security value. Besides, "basic scientific research" is just out of scope.

It took me a while to determine if (B) is relevant. but then I realized if the public have "detailed knowledge" of the country's advanced technology, the dissemination would already have been taken place
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Re: Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict   [#permalink] 12 Dec 2017, 12:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.