nahid78 wrote:
Even in a democracy, it is necessary to restrict the dissemination of advanced technological knowledge that is of commercial or national-security value. Dissemination to certain countries, those that are or will be competitors or enemies, should be selectively
prohibited. There must, however, be free exchange of scientific information.
In order to act in accordance with the position above, it would be necessary to be able to rely on each of the following EXCEPT:
(A) It is possible to distinguish with confidence, despite any changes in the international environment, friendly or noncompetitive from hostile or competitive nations.
(B) In a democracy, it is not necessary that the public have detailed knowledge of the country’s advanced technology in order, for example, to make informed decisions about the direction public policy should take.
(C) In most fields of science, basic scientific research is further advanced in countries that are democracies than in countries that are not democracies.
(D) In each field of science, it is possible to distinguish scientific information from advanced technological knowledge that is of commercial or national-security value.
(E) In cases where a company that uses advanced technology is a multinational organization, it is possible to keep information about the technology from being passed across designated national boundaries.
Source: LSAT
--if the info is of commercial/national-security value, it's dissemination needs to be restricted.
--if the destination is to current/future competitors/enemies, the dissemination of that type of info should be prohibited.
--but there must be free exchange of scientific info.
(A), (D), (E) can be quickly eliminated as they are required for the principle to follow.
(C) is irrelevant. We don't care if some research is more advanced in one country than another, we only care if they have commercial/national-security value. Besides, "basic scientific research" is just out of scope.
It took me a while to determine if (B) is relevant. but then I realized if the public have "detailed knowledge" of the country's advanced technology, the dissemination would already have been taken place