Last visit was: 07 Sep 2026, 06:07 It is currently 07 Sep 2026, 06:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,189
Own Kudos:
839,703
 [4]
Given Kudos: 111,359
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,189
Kudos: 839,703
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
postAlone
Joined: 17 Feb 2026
Last visit: 29 Aug 2026
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Posts: 50
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AbhishekP220108
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2024
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 705
Own Kudos:
819
 [1]
Given Kudos: 207
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
GMAT Focus 2: 595 Q84 V78 DI77
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 595 Q84 V78 DI77
Posts: 705
Kudos: 819
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,189
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,359
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,189
Kudos: 839,703
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Every student at Overland High School receives guidance counseling from either Ms. Hanner or Mr. Land. A review of college admissions data for students graduating from Overland during the last five years shows that, on average, Ms. Hanner was the guidance counselor for fifty-five percent of the students who applied to four-year colleges and forty percent of the students who were accepted at four-year colleges. These figures were quite consistent from year to year over the last five years.

Which of the following can be logically inferred about the past five years from the statements above?

(A) The total number of students graduating from Overland each year has remained roughly constant.

(B) Mr. Land has been assigned the majority of students with poor study skills.

(C) The percentage of applicants who are accepted to four-year colleges is higher among students guided by Mr. Land than it is among students guided by Ms. Hanner.

(D) The career goals of the students under the guidance of Ms. Hanner and Mr. Land have remained largely unchanged.

(E) The overall grade point average of students under Mr. Land's guidance has been higher than the average of students under Ms. Hanner's guidance.


Official Explanation



The words "can be logically inferred" indicate that this is an Inference question. To untangle an Inference question stimulus, just read and paraphrase the statements. There is no argument to analyze. Here, every student at the school is counseled by one of two people. One of the two counselors, Ms. Hanner, counseled fifty-five percent of the students who applied to four-year colleges, and forty percent of the students who were accepted at four year colleges.

Inference questions are typically not predictable. Here, however, one might at least note that since there are only two counselors in the school, and the stimulus gives the percentages for one of the counselors, the percentages for the other counselor can be determined. Since Ms. Hanner was the counselor for fifty-five percent of the students who applied to four year colleges, it must be that Mr. Land was the counselor for the other forty-five percent. Since Ms. Hanner was the counselor for forty percent of the students who were accepted at four-year colleges, Mr. Land was the counselor for the other sixty percent.

(A) does not necessarily follow, because the stimulus gives no information about total students at Overland, just proportions within the total graduates.

(B) cannot be inferred. There is no way to properly link applications and acceptance figures to the quality of study skills.

(C) can be inferred from the stimulus, and is correct. Compared to Ms. Hanner, Mr. Land guided fewer of the applicants but more of the accepted students. Therefore, it must be true that a larger percentage of Mr. Land's students who applied to college were accepted. To verify this, suppose there were 200 applicants and 100 of them were accepted. Ms. Hanner would then have guided 55% of the 200 applicants, or 110 students, and 40% of the 100 who were accepted, or 40 students. Mr. Land would have guided just 90 applicants but 60 of those accepted. A larger fraction of Mr. Land's applicants were accepted, so (C) must be true.

(D) cannot be inferred. There is no information about the career goals of students.

(E) may seem tempting, because the acceptance rate for four-year college is higher for Mr. Land's students (overall) than it is for Ms. Hanner's. But the stimulus doesn't indicate why this is so. It could be that the overall grade point average of Mr. Land's students has been higher, but it doesn't have to be.

TAKEAWAY: It's crucial to keep in mind that on Test Day, an Inference is something that must be true from the stimulus.­
User avatar
LucidPilot
Joined: 29 May 2026
Last visit: 12 Aug 2026
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As per your explanation "Mr. Land guided fewer of the applicants but more of the accepted student" . But is it necessary that all the student got accepted into colleges ? Mr Land got 45% of student assigned and they may not have gotten into any college. Please explain where i am thinking wrong.

Bunuel



Official Explanation



The words "can be logically inferred" indicate that this is an Inference question. To untangle an Inference question stimulus, just read and paraphrase the statements. There is no argument to analyze. Here, every student at the school is counseled by one of two people. One of the two counselors, Ms. Hanner, counseled fifty-five percent of the students who applied to four-year colleges, and forty percent of the students who were accepted at four year colleges.

Inference questions are typically not predictable. Here, however, one might at least note that since there are only two counselors in the school, and the stimulus gives the percentages for one of the counselors, the percentages for the other counselor can be determined. Since Ms. Hanner was the counselor for fifty-five percent of the students who applied to four year colleges, it must be that Mr. Land was the counselor for the other forty-five percent. Since Ms. Hanner was the counselor for forty percent of the students who were accepted at four-year colleges, Mr. Land was the counselor for the other sixty percent.

(A) does not necessarily follow, because the stimulus gives no information about total students at Overland, just proportions within the total graduates.

(B) cannot be inferred. There is no way to properly link applications and acceptance figures to the quality of study skills.

(C) can be inferred from the stimulus, and is correct. Compared to Ms. Hanner, Mr. Land guided fewer of the applicants but more of the accepted students. Therefore, it must be true that a larger percentage of Mr. Land's students who applied to college were accepted. To verify this, suppose there were 200 applicants and 100 of them were accepted. Ms. Hanner would then have guided 55% of the 200 applicants, or 110 students, and 40% of the 100 who were accepted, or 40 students. Mr. Land would have guided just 90 applicants but 60 of those accepted. A larger fraction of Mr. Land's applicants were accepted, so (C) must be true.

(D) cannot be inferred. There is no information about the career goals of students.

(E) may seem tempting, because the acceptance rate for four-year college is higher for Mr. Land's students (overall) than it is for Ms. Hanner's. But the stimulus doesn't indicate why this is so. It could be that the overall grade point average of Mr. Land's students has been higher, but it doesn't have to be.

TAKEAWAY: It's crucial to keep in mind that on Test Day, an Inference is something that must be true from the stimulus.­
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,832
Own Kudos:
14,411
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,832
Kudos: 14,411
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Every student at Overland High School receives guidance counseling from either Ms. Hanner or Mr. Land. A review of college admissions data for students graduating from Overland during the last five years shows that, on average, Ms. Hanner was the guidance counselor for fifty-five percent of the students who applied to four-year colleges and forty percent of the students who were accepted at four-year colleges. These figures were quite consistent from year to year over the last five years.

Which of the following can be logically inferred about the past five years from the statements above?

Ms. Hanner counseled 55% of the applicants but only 40% of the accepted students. Therefore, Mr. Land counseled 45% of the applicants but 60% of the accepted students. So Mr. Land’s students made up a smaller share of applicants but a larger share of acceptances. That means his applicants had a higher acceptance rate.

(A) The total number of students graduating from Overland each year has remained roughly constant.

This is not supported. The passage gives percentages, not total numbers of graduates.

(B) Mr. Land has been assigned the majority of students with poor study skills.

This is not supported. We are told nothing about study skills.

(C) The percentage of applicants who are accepted to four-year colleges is higher among students guided by Mr. Land than it is among students guided by Ms. Hanner.

This is correct. Mr. Land had 45% of applicants but 60% of acceptances, while Ms. Hanner had 55% of applicants but only 40% of acceptances. Therefore, the acceptance rate was higher among Mr. Land’s applicants.

(D) The career goals of the students under the guidance of Ms. Hanner and Mr. Land have remained largely unchanged.

This is not supported. The passage discusses college applications and acceptances, not career goals.

(E) The overall grade point average of students under Mr. Land's guidance has been higher than the average of students under Ms. Hanner's guidance.

This is not supported. Higher acceptance rates could be due to many factors; the passage gives no GPA information.

Answer: (C)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts