GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Jul 2018, 09:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 587
Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2009, 23:55
1
5
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

62% (01:23) correct 38% (01:41) wrong based on 505

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

67% (00:32) correct 33% (00:44) wrong based on 482

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

16% (00:45) correct 84% (00:56) wrong based on 501

HideShow timer Statistics

Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves Line short-term. Companies’ hopes that promotions might have a positive
aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify.

A price promotion entices only a brand’s (10) long-term or “loyal” customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced. They simply avoid paying
more than they have to when one of (15) their customary brands is temporarily available at a reduced price. A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers
of a brand, as it attracts virtually (20) no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotions have lingering aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to
a brand’s reputation or erosion of (25) customer loyalty, as is often feared.

So why do companies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would (30) be more of them. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss. While short-term price promotions can have legitimate uses, such as (35) reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to management, which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line.
Q3:The primary purpose of the passage is to
* compare the arguments in favor of a certain strategy with those against it
* attack a certain strategy by enumerating its negative consequences
* justify the use of a certain strategy in light of certain criticisms that have been made against it
* advocate a particular strategy by arguing against an alternative
* explain the effects of a certain strategy and the primary motivations for adopting it



Q4:According to the passage, which of the following is the reason why short-term price promotions do not attract new long-term customers to a brand?
* Short-term price promotions do not produce an increase in sales.
* Customers come to regard the promotional price as the fair price and the regular price as excessive.
* Most customers select among competing products largely on the basis of price and very few are loyal to any particular brand.
* Customers who have not previously bought the promoted brand are almost never persuaded to do so by the short-term price promotions.
* Any customers that a brand gains by means of a short-term price promotion are liable to be lost when a competing brand has a similar promotion.



Q5:The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (Last line ) is provided by
A the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
B the frequency with which price promotions occur
C price promotions’ inability to attract new customers
D price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales
E the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions




Could you provide explanation on 3rd question?

_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1476
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2009, 02:55
EBC.

Regarding the third question, the passage explains the effect of price promotion and motive behind it to increase sales. the passage does not advocate any strategy. Hence, D is out. It does not justify the use of any strategy. Hence, C is out. It also does not compare the argument in favor of price promotion with the one against it. Hence, A is out.

Both B and E look correct. However, E has better coverage. Hence, it should be the answer.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
Posts: 21
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2009, 19:35
rampuria wrote:
EDB

Rampuria
can u explain the 3rd one as to why it is B
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1482
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2009, 06:16
Id like to know why the answer for #3 is B as well. I had it pegged down to D, as the 'bottom line' referred to sales, I thought, and the last sentence does mention that these short term price discounts result in an increase in sales.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 1
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2009, 23:05
I thought it's EDA. But if the OA is B, it could be because of
IMO, "which is therefore reluctant
to abandon this strategy despite
its effect on the bottom line."
This last sentence claims that price promotions are occurring often because of management's attraction but this frequency is hurting the bottom line.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 234
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2009, 13:37
Got E and D for 3 and 4...Can someone please provide the explanation for 5???
_________________

Choose Life

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2009
Posts: 91
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2009, 04:17
IMO E D D. answer to 5th question should be D but not B. i agree with the icandy explanation for 5th question..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Posts: 152
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2009, 13:14
I am still confused in case of Q5 (why is the answer B?)
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 120
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2010, 09:50
For last question I feel C should be that answer. Bottom line of promotions is to get new customers, however promotions fail to get new customers.
_________________


R E S P E C T


Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1344
GPA: 3.77
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2010, 10:03
KissGMAT wrote:
For last question I feel C should be that answer. Bottom line of promotions is to get new customers, however promotions fail to get new customers.


I would disagree read this
" A
price promotion does not increase
the number of long-term customers
of a brand, as it attracts virtually
(20) no new customers in the first place.

Nor do price promotions have linger-
ing aftereffects for a brand, even
negative"
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2010
Posts: 136
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2010, 20:58
can some one expain why option a is wrong for 5 q
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 279
Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013
Reviews Badge
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2010, 12:28
Can anybody explain the subtle line between these two choises? Am I right thinking that C is correct, but D portraites much bigger picture?

The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by
A the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
B the frequency with which price promotions occur
C price promotions’ inability to attract new customers
D price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales
E the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions

Thanks.
Moderator
User avatar
Status: battlecruiser, operational...
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 948
Schools: Carey '16
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2010, 13:47
Financier wrote:
Can anybody explain the subtle line between these two choises? Am I right thinking that C is correct, but D portraites much bigger picture?

The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by
A the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
B the frequency with which price promotions occur
C price promotions’ inability to attract new customers
D price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales
E the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions

Thanks.


yeah i went with C on the last one as well. Please explain. Thanks.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

BSchool Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 127
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE: Information Technology (Retail)
Re: RC - Price Promotion causes Demotion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2012, 03:14
vwjetty wrote:
Financier wrote:
Can anybody explain the subtle line between these two choises? Am I right thinking that C is correct, but D portraites much bigger picture?

The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by
A the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
B the frequency with which price promotions occur
C price promotions’ inability to attract new customers
D price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales
E the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions

Thanks.


yeah i went with C on the last one as well. Please explain. Thanks.



There is still no explanation for Q5 ? Can anyone please explain the last ques ?
_________________

You want something, go get it . Period !

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 51
Re: Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2016, 20:28
3.The primary purpose of the passage is to
E. explain the effects of a certain strategy and the primary motivations for adopting it.
The first passage introduced short-term price promotions, the second passage discussed the consequences of short-term price promotions and the last passage mentioned why managers used this strategy. Choice E covered all of mentioned-above information.

4. According to the passage, which of the following is the reason why short-term price promotions do not attract new long-term customers to a brand?
B. Customers come to regard the promotional price as the fair price and the regular price as excessive.
D. Customers who have not previously bought the promoted brand are almost never persuaded to do so by the short-term price promotions.
Three others choices are quite easily to be moved. Choice B mentioned the opinion of loyal customer, not new customers.
Choice D is correct since this sentence "people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced."

5. The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (Last line ) is provided by
B the frequency with which price promotions occur
4 other choices are all mentioned in the passage, so just choice B is not. I think that choice B is correct since it is as a conclusion of 4 remaining choices.
VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1165
Re: Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2016, 07:28
when a passage is easy, the question can still be hard.
this is an example of the case.

ability to answer a question depend on ability to infer from a sentence in a passage. this inference require a full comprehention of a few sentences. this inference is quite difference from reading skill for a main idea and structure of passage

so we need the second skill, inference skill for RC. luckily, this skill is more easy to master than the reading skill.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Posts: 4
Location: United States (CT)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Reviews Badge
Re: Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2016, 12:33
For question 5, I also marked as C. Below is my reasoning:

Author is in someway criticizing the strategy of short-term pricing providing evidence that "it attracts virtually no new customers in the first place". And in the last paragraph tries to emphasize the point that this strategy is run under loss.

In the last line author provides reason that management is reluctant to stop this because of the "increase in sales" standpoint ignoring the negative effect --> bottom line.

Comparing the options in this line of thought --> C becomes an optimal choice.

Please let me know if my reasoning is flawed.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2015
Posts: 16
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2016, 20:57
ankit0411 wrote:
vwjetty wrote:
Financier wrote:
Can anybody explain the subtle line between these two choises? Am I right thinking that C is correct, but D portraites much bigger picture?

The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by
A the lack of lingering aftereffects from price promotions
B the frequency with which price promotions occur
C price promotions’ inability to attract new customers
D price promotions’ recognizable effect on sales
E the legitimate uses to which management can put price promotions

Thanks.


yeah i went with C on the last one as well. Please explain. Thanks.



There is still no explanation for Q5 ? Can anyone please explain the last ques ?



The first sentence of the last para states the below:

"So why do companies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them. "
Clearly, the author says that the price promotions are not worthy to companies. Had they been, there would be more occurrences of price promotions. From this, we can infer that the answer would be 'B'.

We need to understand that this is a inference question. Hence we must be able to prove the answer by materials stated in the passage.

Hope this helps.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 425
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2016, 02:52
1
The passage suggests that evidence for price promotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (Last line ) is provided by

First off, question is not about what is bottom line.

We have to find out relation between price promotions and effect on the bottom line. / The evidence used for that relationship.

"which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line." so that means price promotion is negatively affecting bottom line, which is "recognizable increase in sales " now the evidence to prove that is given : "Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them" so the frequency is not that great. relation between price promotions and effect on the bottom line would have been positive there would be more "price promotion" thing.

so B the frequency with which price promotions occur
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 674
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2017, 10:03
My answers are E D D
Time taken : 6 min 15 seconds.
Bottom line = sales .
But why OA for 3 is B not D ??
Re: Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term &nbs [#permalink] 15 Apr 2017, 10:03

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.