Dear mikemcgarry
thank you for your post.
I think also it helps to know real situations to compare with CR Questions. I will try to continue to read the Economist which is my best newpaper. I have finished the FOuntainhead to book to improve my speed. Now I 'm facing a new difficulty, I realize that I'm writing too much in my notes trying to summarize the argument.
Here is my steps :
When Reading 1 CR sentence, I write the summary with notes
Exemple CR question :
n Asia, where palm trees are non-native, the trees' flowers have traditionally been pollinated by hand, which has kept palm fruit productivity unnaturally low. When weevils known to be efficient pollinators of palm flowers were introduced into Asia in 1980, palm fruit productivity increased -- by up to 50 percent in some areas -- but then decreased sharply in 1984.
Which of the following statements, if true, would best explain the 1984 decrease in productivity?
MY NOTES :
- Where PT =not N, TF poll. by hand => prod low
- In 80, W=eff, prod ↑ <= 50 in area, but ↘ 84
I draw a line with dates : ----80 W----- 84 ↘ -------
It takes me almost 2 minutes to write this diagrams and understand the argument.
Do you have some advices to save times ?
Thank you
Teoh