Hi Rishab2409,Good news: your final answer
E is correct, and your logic for why is spot on. There's just one label to fix in Statement 2 so your understanding stays clean.
The mix-up: In Statement 2 you called the
$7.50 the "total processing fees." It's actually the
total shipping fees for the five orders. That's why your own line reads a little contradictory - you labeled it processing, then said you have no info on processing. Let me untangle it.
Each order costs
P + nS, where P is the fixed processing fee per order and S is the shipping fee per book.
-
Statement (1): March - January = (P + 3S) - (P + S) = 2S =
$1, so
S = $0.50. P stays unknown.
Insufficient. ✓ (your reasoning)
-
Statement (2): The shipping units across the five orders are 1+2+3+4+5 =
15, so total shipping =
15S =
$7.50, giving
S = $0.50 again. This tells us nothing about P.
Insufficient. ✓
So both statements only pin down
S, and the question asks for the full total
5P + 15S - which still depends on the unknown
P.
Why the combination still fails (two quick cases): both statements hold as long as S =
$0.50, no matter what P is.
- If
P = $1: total = 5(
1) +
7.50 =
$12.50- If
P = $2: total = 5(
2) +
7.50 =
$17.50Same statements, two different totals -
not sufficient, even together. That's your E.
Bottom line: your conclusion is right - just remember the
$7.50 is
shipping, and the piece that's never given is the
processing fee P.
Answer: ERishab2409
Kindly correct my understanding: I read the statements and deciphered that
(1) We have shipping fees as $.50, as the processing fees is fixed and the only difference would be of the variable fees (shipping fees). We have no information on processing fees. Insufficient.
(2) We are given that the total processing fees is $7.5 for 15 books, which boils down to $.5 per book. Again, we have no information on processing fees. Insufficient.
(1) + (2) We only have info on shipping fees and nothing on processing fees. Insufficient.
Answer (E)