Welcome back, and first, mentally take the 575 off the table, because testing through a fever measures how your brain performs while fighting a virus, not your actual ability. Your 655 is the far more honest read on where you stand.
On the eject button, I'd reframe it slightly: a tactical guess is a fine safety valve, but needing it often means the content isn't yet automatic, so the deeper fix is building mastery until the right approach comes fast and those 6-minute questions mostly stop on their own. The shift to Quant, then Data Insights, then Verbal is sensible, and rebuilding with untimed precision sets first, then layering timing back in as confirmation, is exactly right.
Getting from a true 655 to 705+ is a real but achievable climb. Rebuild topic by topic, keep the daily volume sustainable, and you'll be in good position for the retake.
Puranjaysapra
Hi everyone,I’m currently a Project Manager at an investment bank, looking to pivot into Private Equity. To make that transition, I know I need a 705+ on the Focus Edition. I’m writing this debrief because I just took a month-long break after a disastrous second attempt, and I wanted to share my data so others don’t make the same mistakes I did.Here is the breakdown of my journey so far, the physiological collapse of my second attempt, and my structured plan for the reboot.Attempt 1: The Baseline (655) My first official attempt yielded a 655. It was a solid start, and it proved I had the baseline logic. But for the M7 and PE recruiting, a 655 is a "safe" score, not a standout. I knew I had a higher ceiling, so I immediately booked a retake and started drilling advanced logic.Attempt 2: The Disaster (575) Test Date: Late April. I woke up on test day feeling completely off. I was fighting a severe head cold, but my thermometer read a low baseline temperature, so I decided to push through and test anyway. This was my fatal error.I took the exam in the afternoon, right when my body’s inflammatory response was peaking, and I chose to run the order: Verbal -> Data Insights -> Quant.Here is what the ESR data showed me:- The Verbal Collapse (76 / 23rd Percentile): The fever destroyed my working memory. I spent 4.8 minutes on a single Verbal question—and still got it wrong. My brain just couldn't hold the complex noun structures.
- The DI Time-Sink (78 / 69th Percentile): Because Verbal drained my cognitive RAM, I hit a wall in DI. I spent an agonizing 6 minutes on one question. Because of that pacing failure, I had to blindly guess on the last 4 DI questions and the last 3 Verbal questions just to finish the sections.
- The Quant Resilience (82 / 75th Percentile): Ironically, running purely on algorithmic "autopilot," my Quant stayed somewhat resilient at the end, but the damage was already done.
My 3 Golden Takeaways for the Community After a month away to clear my head (and my lungs), I’m locking back in. Here is what I learned the hard way:- Do NOT test sick. Your cognitive RAM is the first thing to go. You cannot "muscle through" 700-level Critical Reasoning when your body is fighting a virus. Reschedule the exam.
- The 2.5-Minute Eject Button. My 575 was a pacing failure, not a logic failure. Staring at a multi-source reasoning tab for 6 minutes is a project management failure. If the logic doesn't click in 2.5 minutes, make a tactical guess and move on.
- Section Order Matters. Taking Verbal first while feeling fatigued destroyed my reserves. For my retake, I am shifting to Quant -> DI -> Verbal to get the algorithmic math out of the way early and preserve my linguistic stamina.
The Reboot Plan I am back to the grind now. My immediate focus is untimed precision sets to reactivate my "Boring Answer Filter" for RC/CR, and strictly limiting my daily prep to avoid burnout.I’d love to hear from anyone who has successfully bounced back from a massive score drop, or anyone who has transitioned from a PM role to PE. Any advice on keeping the momentum alive during a reboot is highly appreciated!Thanks for reading, and good luck to everyone grinding right now.