Last visit was: 21 May 2025, 01:30 It is currently 21 May 2025, 01:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Fedemaravilla
Joined: 14 Sep 2017
Last visit: 08 Apr 2019
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
137
 [13]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Italy
Posts: 27
Kudos: 137
 [13]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,482
Own Kudos:
29,912
 [8]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,482
Kudos: 29,912
 [8]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,067
Own Kudos:
2,113
 [2]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,067
Kudos: 2,113
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Raj30
Joined: 07 Jan 2019
Last visit: 26 May 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 103
Concentration: International Business, Finance
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 55
Kudos: 116
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Fedemaravilla
Geographers and historians have traditionally held the view that Antarctica was first sighted around 1820, but some sixteenth-century European maps show a body that resembles the polar landmass, even though explorers of the period never saw it. Some scholars, therefore, argue that the continent must have been discovered and mapped by the ancients, whose maps are known to have served as models for the European cartographers.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the inference drawn by the scholars?
A) the question of who first sighted Antarctica in modern times still much debated, and no one has been able to present conclusive evidence.
B) between 3000 and 9000 years ago, the world was warmer than it is now, and the polar landmass was presumably smaller.
C) there are only a few sixteenth-century global maps that show a continental landmass at the South Pole.
D) most attributions of surprising accomplishments to ancient civilization or even extraterrestrials are eventually discredited or rejected as preposterous.
E) ancient philosophers believed that there had to be a large landmass at the south pole to balance the northern continents and make the world symmetrical.
Dear Fedemaravilla,

I'm happy to respond. :-) This is a very good CR question.

We know that some 16th century European maps show a southern polar mass even though nobody in Europe had seen Antartica. That's evidence.

There's also a piece of evidence at the end: "maps [of the ancients] are known to have served as models for the European cartographers."

Finally, the conclusion: "the continent must have been discovered and mapped by the ancients."

The conclusion is a bold conclusion about extensive travel by the ancients. What would weaken it?

(A) the question of who first sighted Antarctica in modern times still much debated, and no one has been able to present conclusive evidence.
This may be, but it's irrelevant to what the ancients did or didn't do. This is incorrect.

(B) between 3000 and 9000 years ago, the world was warmer than it is now, and the polar landmass was presumably smaller.
Hmm. If Antartica had been smaller, it would have been harder to find, but this doesn't mean that that the ancients couldn't find it. This is incorrect.

(C) there are only a few sixteenth-century global maps that show a continental landmass at the South Pole.
Irrelevant. If there are only some, why do they have that mass to the south? That's the common feature we need to explain: it doesn't have to present on every map. This is incorrect.

(D) most attributions of surprising accomplishments to ancient civilization or even extraterrestrials are eventually discredited or rejected as preposterous.
This is vague and suggestive. Other impressive stuff turned out to be false, so this impressive thing will turn out to be false. This is not a watertight form of argument, so this is incorrect.

(E) ancient philosophers believed that there had to be a large landmass at the south pole to balance the northern continents and make the world symmetrical.
Bingo! The ancients put the southern land mass on their map, not because they sailed there and discovered it, but for philosophical reasons about balance. That totally would explain why an Antartica-like thing would be at the bottom of ancient maps, thus suggesting this to 16th century map makers, but the ancients never left their ports to discover this. They simply sat in their armchairs and came up with this by philosophizing. This would explain how the mass go on the maps without any adventurous sea journeys happening. This is by far the best answer.

OA = (E)

This is a great question and an interesting topic.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)



Got your explanation!
The official explanation is as follows:

The inference that Antarctica was discovered by the ancients would be weakened if there were an alternative explanation of why the ancients might have drawn a landmass in that area on their maps. Choice E provides just such an explanation, so it is the correct answer. Choice A is incorrect because the identity of the modern discoverer of the Antarctica has no bearing on why the continent was included on sixteenth-century maps. Since the ancients referred to in the passage likely postdate the warm period mentioned in Choice B, that option is also incorrect. The passage never mentions how many sixteenth-century maps show a southern polar landmass, and the argument does not depend upon any particular quantity, so Choice C is incorrect. Choice D comments upon the conclusion but does not pertain to the argument itself, so it is also incorrect.

I didn't get the explanation for option b here. Can you please elaborate?
avatar
komalpatna
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 10 Dec 2023
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 73
Posts: 31
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Other option does not weaken the scholar inference, option E states that, the ancient people draw map just to make the poles symatrical without discovering it.
avatar
Siddharth718
Joined: 20 May 2021
Last visit: 12 Oct 2021
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question is good but the only problem I feel with option E is that you should know that Antarctica lies in the South Pole ...what if someone with no geographical idea attempt this question ...hopefully someone can clarify my doubt
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,299
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,299
Kudos: 941
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7307 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts