Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 09:23 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 09:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
surat
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Last visit: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Location: work chair
Posts: 125
Kudos: 733
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
surat
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Last visit: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Location: work chair
Posts: 125
Kudos: 733
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
stolyar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Last visit: 06 May 2014
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 1,882
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
surat
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Last visit: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Location: work chair
Posts: 125
Kudos: 733
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stolyar
from https://www.dictionary.com:

TO LEAD
To serve as a route for; take: The path led them to a cemetery.
To guide the behavior or opinion of; induce: led us to believe otherwise.

LEAD TO A NOUN and LEAD TO DO SMTH are both OK.


agree with you. the only tiny problem is that on gmat they don't accept two answers... :lol:
User avatar
surat
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Last visit: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Location: work chair
Posts: 125
Kudos: 733
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stolyar
do you have an official explanation?


unfortunatelly, no.. :(

this question was on one of the tests of cd, supplied with book, i just screen-printed the question to discuss..
User avatar
wonder_gmat
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Last visit: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 117
Own Kudos:
Location: United States
Posts: 117
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My guess at the explanation would be:

Not only the use of create instead of creation plays part in this, the use of word unrelated (more sufficient) instead of less related also plays part. So as styolar mentioned to lead to can be used with noun and verb, the use of unrelated just makes the sentence more efficient and to the point.
avatar
LIONHEART
Joined: 08 Oct 2003
Last visit: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 7
Location: INDIA
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey guys,
I guess I POSTED THE EXPALNATION to mr surat twice,thinking it is for the forum.
here it is (or so ),


lets examine the underlined part of the sentence,''to the creation of divisions that are'',

the subject here is ''creation''(noun),''divisions'' also is a subject but the question is, what are we talking about here -we are talking about the ''creation of divisions'', which shows that ''creation'' is the main subject.

RULE 1,the verb follows the subject,hence it should be ''the creation of divisions that is (instread of are)'', but we do not have a given choice of that kind here.hence the ''divisions ''( as in choice C) takes over as the main subject, as given in the choce C) TO '' CREATE DIVISIONS THAT ARE'' SUITS THE BEST.COS ''TO CREATE'' HERE ADORNS THE GARB OF a verb than a subject. AND ''ARE'' folllows ''DIVISIONS''(plural).

RULE 2, avoid WORDINESS.
HENCE THE ISSUE Of ''less related '' to ''unrelated'' arises.
welcome any comments,

have fun!
User avatar
surat
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Last visit: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Location: work chair
Posts: 125
Kudos: 733
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LIONHEART
hey guys,
I guess I POSTED THE EXPALNATION to mr surat twice,thinking it is for the forum.
................
HENCE THE ISSUE Of ''less related '' to ''unrelated'' arises.
welcome any comments,

have fun!


no comments at all, everything is clear, alisher... :) (alisher is arabian name, translation from lionheart.. :wink: )
avatar
hota
Joined: 10 Oct 2003
Last visit: 21 Nov 2003
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Posts: 27
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You guys are going about it all wrong....this one's actually pretty easy.

surat

early success and the arrogance it often fosters may lead growing companies to the creation of new divisions that are, increasingly, less related to their core business.

1. the creation of new divisions that are, increasingly, less related
2. the creation of new divisions that are increasingly less related
3. create new divisions that are increasingly unrelated
4. be increasingly less related while creating new divisions
5. increasingly create new divisions with less relation


Using the words "increasingly less" doesn't make sense. It's unclear and unidiomatic...how can you have something increasing when it's declining?

This eliminates 2 & 4.

Now the term "less related" is unidomatic. For example, would I be less related to a co-worker than to my brother? That doesn't make sense, does it? You are either related or unrelated. I am UNRELATED to my co-worker.

This eliminates 1 & 5 along with 2 & 4 as well. In each of these there are other errors too that I won't go into.

I've found in SC, that you'll usually find more than one error in an incorrect sentence.
avatar
LIONHEART
Joined: 08 Oct 2003
Last visit: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 7
Location: INDIA
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey ,
thanks ''look''!( I belive it the NOUN here not the VERB pal.I believ surat means ur ''look '' in hindi!)or may be ''handsome (khoobsurat)!
have fun!
avatar
LIONHEART
Joined: 08 Oct 2003
Last visit: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 7
Location: INDIA
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey ,
hota!Must agree quite a scientific way of explaining!
nice, anyway .Thanks!
have fun!
User avatar
Professor
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 562
Own Kudos:
Posts: 562
Kudos: 184
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
surat
early success and the arrogance it often fosters may lead growing companies to the creation of new divisions that are, increasingly, less related to their core business.

1. the creation of new divisions that are, increasingly, less related
2. the creation of new divisions that are increasingly less related
3. create new divisions that are increasingly unrelated
4. be increasingly less related while creating new divisions
5. increasingly create new divisions with less relation


B.

unreleted is a correct expression.
we prefer "unreleted" to "less related" as we do with "regardless" to irregardless"
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 893
Own Kudos:
Posts: 893
Kudos: 647
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3 for me. The only reason I chose 3 was IMO creation of did not fit here.
User avatar
kripalkavi
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Last visit: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 639
Own Kudos:
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 639
Kudos: 135
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'll go with C. 'Increasingly less' is a turn off.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts