GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2019, 18:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 29 Jan 2015
Posts: 1418
Location: India
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2017, 08:47
1
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

57% (01:19) correct 43% (01:21) wrong based on 259 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion, federal government promulgated new tax laws requiring that citizens attest prior hand to have their properties and income assessed by independent tax regulatory body, to be set up in three months.

A. that citizens attest prior hand to have their properties and income assessed
B. that citizens attest prior hand for to have their properties and income assessed
C. the attesting by citizens prior hand to have their properties and income assessed
D. citizens attesting prior hand to have their properties and income assessed
E. citizens to attest prior hand to have their properties and income assessed

_________________
If you liked my post, kindly give me a Kudos. Thanks.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Sep 2013
Posts: 61
Re: Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2017, 09:34
I think
....laws requiring that... is not correct usage.
It should be
...laws requiring [something/someone]

With this thing in mind, I came down to D and E.

D gives you a feeling that laws require certain type of citizens attending prior hand.... This is not correct.

E makes sense IMO.


Feel free to suggest.

Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 14 May 2017
Posts: 6
Re: Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2018, 07:07
Should "that" not proceed requiring? As this is a subjunctive case, I thought it should and marked A as the answer. I request some inputs on this.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1564
Re: Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2018, 03:31
2
aartiydv09, we can use require/requiring with or without the subjunctive:

The law requires you to place recyclables in the appropriate bin.
The law requires that you place recyclables in the appropriate bin.

E uses the first of these forms, and that's fine.

There are some other issues with the sentence, though. It needs more articles before some of the nouns (the federal government, an independent tax regulatory body) and "attest prior hand" doesn't work. I think the intended meaning is more like "arrange in advance."
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 16 Sep 2011
Posts: 90
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2018, 09:56
DmitryFarber wrote:
aartiydv09, we can use require/requiring with or without the subjunctive:

The law requires you to place recyclables in the appropriate bin.
The law requires that you place recyclables in the appropriate bin.

E uses the first of these forms, and that's fine.

There are some other issues with the sentence, though. It needs more articles before some of the nouns (the federal government, an independent tax regulatory body) and "attest prior hand" doesn't work. I think the intended meaning is more like "arrange in advance."


Hi Dmitry,

As mentioned subjunctive form can take either "that" or "to", which makes me wonder what makes answer a as wrong. The sentence looks correct in its original form
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1564
Re: Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2018, 22:27
A and E are really interchangeable. The rest are all wrong, but I'd say there's no definitive answer to this one, especially since the rest of the sentence needs some changes.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion   [#permalink] 31 Jan 2018, 22:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Given the high amount of money laundering and tax evasion

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne