Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 17:58 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 17:58 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
09 Jul 2026, 06:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
Predicting the flaw: assuming the system works, it doesn't consider that more drivers will come to the downtown core, so traffic congestion isn't lighter, but could be even heavier.
(A) a timeline is irrelevant to if the city succeeds in meeting its target.
(B) The key here is "initial". Even if it experiences those problems at the start, it can still overcome them quickly and meet the city's goal.
(C) Yes. Close to our prediction.
(D) How is the older system relevant. We are only talking about the new system here.
(E) Again, not relevant to the conclusion of the argument. Even if, the investment isn't justified, it could still drastically reduce traffic congestion.
I pick (C)
(A) a timeline is irrelevant to if the city succeeds in meeting its target.
(B) The key here is "initial". Even if it experiences those problems at the start, it can still overcome them quickly and meet the city's goal.
(C) Yes. Close to our prediction.
(D) How is the older system relevant. We are only talking about the new system here.
(E) Again, not relevant to the conclusion of the argument. Even if, the investment isn't justified, it could still drastically reduce traffic congestion.
I pick (C)
Bunuel
09 Jul 2026, 07:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
IMO : C
A - timleline is out of scope
B - again how errors will cause the delay is not our scope
C - well this highlights the flaw as if the plan tends to incourage more people to drive to downtown then maybe it wont be able to solve the congestion problem again.
D - comparing it with old system is not the scope here
E - again 12 mil investment is there as a premise but is not important here.
A - timleline is out of scope
B - again how errors will cause the delay is not our scope
C - well this highlights the flaw as if the plan tends to incourage more people to drive to downtown then maybe it wont be able to solve the congestion problem again.
D - comparing it with old system is not the scope here
E - again 12 mil investment is there as a premise but is not important here.
09 Jul 2026, 07:04
Kudos
Bookmarks
Option A: Timeline is irrelevant. The flaw is not when it happens, but whether it will happen.
Option B: Not a logical flaw (outside of scope)
Option C: Assumes that the increased traffic flow through major intersections will not encourage more people to drive downtown.
If the new system makes driving easier, more people will choose to drive downtown. Then congestion may not decrease by 20%. (So, this directly contradicts the assumption)
Option D: The argument doesn't need to compare old vs new. It already states that the new system will increase results by 25%.
Option E: Not relevant to the conclusion of reducing congestion.
So, Answer C is correct
Option B: Not a logical flaw (outside of scope)
Option C: Assumes that the increased traffic flow through major intersections will not encourage more people to drive downtown.
If the new system makes driving easier, more people will choose to drive downtown. Then congestion may not decrease by 20%. (So, this directly contradicts the assumption)
Option D: The argument doesn't need to compare old vs new. It already states that the new system will increase results by 25%.
Option E: Not relevant to the conclusion of reducing congestion.
So, Answer C is correct
09 Jul 2026, 07:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
IMO - Ans is C
So the GAP here is they directly concludes if we increase the traffic flow by 25% then it automatically means people would not stop in red signal traffic that much or assuming they have reduce signal stoppage less then 20 %.
In my view only option C is making sense other's are irrelevant to fill this gap.
A - Timeline not needed Unrelated irrelvant
B- Mechanical malfunctions again outside irrelevant info
D - It doesn't compare with old date but it gives us new data in different way and conclude
E - Money constraint $12 M not valuable at all.
So C - Make sense it gives some hint after traffic flow improvemnt it may incrrease overall tarffic and could be the reason still people need to wait more so this make sense. Thanks!
So the GAP here is they directly concludes if we increase the traffic flow by 25% then it automatically means people would not stop in red signal traffic that much or assuming they have reduce signal stoppage less then 20 %.
In my view only option C is making sense other's are irrelevant to fill this gap.
A - Timeline not needed Unrelated irrelvant
B- Mechanical malfunctions again outside irrelevant info
D - It doesn't compare with old date but it gives us new data in different way and conclude
E - Money constraint $12 M not valuable at all.
So C - Make sense it gives some hint after traffic flow improvemnt it may incrrease overall tarffic and could be the reason still people need to wait more so this make sense. Thanks!
Bunuel
