Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0907:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway- Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
10 Jul 2026, 07:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
From the passage, it is clear that both are acting as evidences to prove something. We can also infer that the professor is trying to say that Russel did not copy Wittgenstein.
So the first sentence is acting as an evidence to prove a conclusion ( the traditional opinion is false) which professor is criticising. and the second sentence is acting as an evidence to prove the professors position that Russel did not copy.
Option -c perfectly captures this. Hence the correct answer I believe.
Option E seems close but it has problem with the second part. the second part mentions that second sentence acts as additional evidence to prove the conclusion that professor is criticising, which is not correct
So the first sentence is acting as an evidence to prove a conclusion ( the traditional opinion is false) which professor is criticising. and the second sentence is acting as an evidence to prove the professors position that Russel did not copy.
Option -c perfectly captures this. Hence the correct answer I believe.
Option E seems close but it has problem with the second part. the second part mentions that second sentence acts as additional evidence to prove the conclusion that professor is criticising, which is not correct
Bunuel
10 Jul 2026, 07:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
A. Irrelevant as the first portion supports the critics opinion which the professor is seen to oppose
B. Irrelevant as the first portion supports the critics opinion which the professor opposes
C. Relevant as the first portion is used by critics to come to a conclusion that the general view is false and the second is the counter evidence that the professor uses to justify a more cautious defensive stance on the general view. This is apt to what we observe in the passage.
D. Irrelevant as the professor doesent really draw an intermediate conclusion based on the first portion. It belongs to the opposing argument
E. Irrelevant as the second portion doesent agree with the first portion's intent. It weakens the critics interpretation of it.
C.
B. Irrelevant as the first portion supports the critics opinion which the professor opposes
C. Relevant as the first portion is used by critics to come to a conclusion that the general view is false and the second is the counter evidence that the professor uses to justify a more cautious defensive stance on the general view. This is apt to what we observe in the passage.
D. Irrelevant as the professor doesent really draw an intermediate conclusion based on the first portion. It belongs to the opposing argument
E. Irrelevant as the second portion doesent agree with the first portion's intent. It weakens the critics interpretation of it.
C.
10 Jul 2026, 07:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
C would be the answer.
The main conclusion of the professor would be the line this discovery warrants a more circumspect conclusion. Once you identify that we can see the later sentence which is the resoning's second bold statement is in support of that conclusion. The preceding(first bold statement) is the evidence used to support the conclusion the professoer doesn't agree with.
When you read it from the line Many now argue that since this book___and since the notes precede___ those statements are used to get to conclusion that the traditional opinion is obviously false. So the first statement would serve evidence.
C clearly says the same.
A doesn't support professors conclusion
B same for B and aslo Second isn't the position its evidence.
D Intermediate conclusion doesn't support overall conclusion.
E The second evidence supports different conclusion(professor's).
