Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:38 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
metallicafan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 759
Own Kudos:
4,406
 [91]
Given Kudos: 109
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Posts: 759
Kudos: 4,406
 [91]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
85
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,368
 [24]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
muralimba
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Last visit: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
571
 [14]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 65
Kudos: 571
 [14]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [7]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
metallicafan
At a certain bookstore, each notepad costs x dollars and each markers costs y dollars. If $10 is enough to buy 5 notepads and 3 markers, is $10 enough to buy 4 notepads and 4 markers instead?

1). each notepad cost less than $1

2). $10 is enough to buy 11 notepads

Given: 5x + 3y <= 10 .... (I)
Question: Is 4x + 4y <=10 ?....(II)

Statement (1) x < 1.
If x is a little less than 1 but almost 1, then 5x is little less than 5. Putting in (I) above, we get that y is less than \(\frac{5}{3}\).
Now we need to put these values in equation (II) and check.
4x will be a little less than 4 and 4y will be less than 4x\(\frac{5}{3}\) i.e. 6.66. Together, 4x + 4y will be less than 10.66. It may be less than 10 or a little more than 10, hence this is not sufficient.

Statement (2) x < \(\frac{10}{11}\)
If x is a little less than 10/11 but almost 10/11, then 5x is little less than 50/11. Putting in (I) above, we get that y is less than \(\frac{20}{11}\).
Now we need to put these values in equation (II) and check.
4x will be a little less than 40/11 and 4y will be less than 4x\(\frac{20}{11}\) i.e. \(\frac{80}{11}\). Together, 4x + 4y will be less than 120/11 i.e. less than 10.9. It may be less than 10 or more, we do not know, hence this is not sufficient.

Note: You didn't actually need to calculate the data in the second statement. This is because, if we compare 5x + 3y with 4x + 4y, the x term has reduced but the y term has increased. If x is as great as possible, it will keep y small and the extra y in second statement may not matter. We tried with x a little less than 1 in first statement. In second statement, x is smaller than 10/11. Hence, if first statement was not sufficient, no way could the second statement be sufficient.
avatar
fozzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 574
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 543
Posts: 574
Kudos: 6,801
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone explain why "If $10 is enough to buy 5 notepads and 3 markers" => the translation can't be 5x+ 3y = 10 ( what's wrong with this)

and why is it => 5x+3y < = 10
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
4,510
 [1]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 577
Kudos: 4,510
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fozzzy
can someone explain why "If $10 is enough to buy 5 notepads and 3 markers" => the translation can't be 5x+ 3y = 10 ( what's wrong with this)

and why is it => 5x+3y < = 10

LET SAY X= 1 Y =1
THEN 5X + 3Y = 8
STILL 10 DOLLAR IS enough TO BUY 5 NOTEPADS AND 3 MARKERS.

so question wants to say that price of 5 notepads and 3 markers is less than or equal to 10 $

hope it is clear.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [3]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fozzzy
can someone explain why "If $10 is enough to buy 5 notepads and 3 markers" => the translation can't be 5x+ 3y = 10 ( what's wrong with this)

and why is it => 5x+3y < = 10

'is enough' means that it suffices. Whether it suffices perfectly or something is leftover is not specified. e.g. it is correct to say $10 is enough to buy the chocolate bar I want. The bar could cost $5 or $8 or $9.2 or $10 etc. I any case, $10 is enough.

Check out a detailed discussion of this question here: https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2013/09 ... -of-words/
User avatar
NoHalfMeasures
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2013
Last visit: 11 Jul 2023
Posts: 220
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 3.7
WE:Corporate Finance (Retail Banking)
Posts: 220
Kudos: 2,480
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am pretty sure this wasnt intended to be a hard question.
Both statements in a way give the same info. So answer should be either D or E.
Since both x and y have changed in the question (4x+4y≤10?) from the given (5x+3y≤10) the answer has to be E
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 885
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 885
Kudos: 1,801
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
metallicafan
At a certain bookstore, each notepad costs x dollars and each markers costs y dollars. If $10 is enough to buy 5 notepads and 3 markers, is $10 enough to buy 4 notepads and 4 markers instead?

(1) Each notepad cost less than $1
(2) $10 is enough to buy 11 notepads
Do not forget that there are noninteger dollar values, but all values in cents are integers!

\(\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,{\rm{notepads}}\,,\,\,\$ \,n\,\,{\rm{cents}}\,\,{\rm{each}}\,\,\,\left( {n = 100x} \right) \hfill \cr \\
\,{\rm{markers}}\,,\,\,\$ \,m\,\,{\rm{cents}}\,\,{\rm{each}}\,\,\,\left( {m = 100y} \right) \hfill \cr} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,5n + 3m \le 1000\,\,\,\left[ {{\rm{cents}}} \right]\,\,\,\,\left( * \right)\)

\(4n + 4m\,\,\mathop \le \limits^? \,\,1000\,\,\,\left[ {{\rm{cents}}} \right]\,\,\,\,\,\, \Leftrightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,n + m\,\,\mathop \le \limits^? \,\,250\,\,\,\left[ {{\rm{cents}}} \right]\)

\(\left( 1 \right)\,\,n < 100\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {n,m} \right) = \left( {50\,,\,200} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left[ {\,250 + 600 < 1000\,\,\left( * \right)\,} \right]\,\,\,\,\,\, \hfill \cr \\
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {n,m} \right)\, = \left( {50,210} \right)\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left[ {\,250 + 630 < 1000\,\,\left( * \right)\,} \right]\,\,\, \hfill \cr} \right.\)

\(\left( 2 \right)\,\,11n \le 1000\,\,\,\,\mathop \Leftrightarrow \limits^{n\,\,{\mathop{\rm int}} } \,\,\,\,n \le 90\,\,\,\left\{ \matrix{\\
\,\left( {{\rm{Re}}} \right){\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {n,m} \right) = \left( {50,200} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr \\
\,\left( {{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} } \right){\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {n,m} \right)\, = \left( {50,210} \right)\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \hfill \cr} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\)

\(\Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left( {\rm{E}} \right)\)


This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
User avatar
ccooley
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 931
Own Kudos:
1,642
 [5]
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 931
Kudos: 1,642
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
metallicafan
At a certain bookstore, each notepad costs x dollars and each markers costs y dollars. If $10 is enough to buy 5 notepads and 3 markers, is $10 enough to buy 4 notepads and 4 markers instead?

(1) Each notepad cost less than $1
(2) $10 is enough to buy 11 notepads

Here's one way to visualize it. It helps to put yourself into the story when the problem asks about things like shopping and prices! Our intuitions about these topics are often better than our pure math skills.

$10 is enough to buy 5 notepads and 3 markers. Imagine that you have 5 notepads and 3 markers in your shopping cart. But, you'd rather buy 4 notepads and 4 markers. Can you safely 'swap out' a notepad for a marker without going over budget?

For starters, you can definitely do that if a marker is less expensive than a notepad. Since you were under $10 before, you'll still be under $10.

On the other hand, suppose that you're already very close to your budget when you have 5 notepads and 3 markers in your cart. If a marker is more expensive than a notepad, then switching might bring you over budget.

With that in mind, let's look at the statements.

(1) says that a notepad is inexpensive. But a marker could be even cheaper - or it could be much more expensive! Insufficient.

(2) says more or less the same thing. A marker could cost as little as $0.01, or as much as $3 (or more), as long as the notepads were cheap enough. If we switch a notepad for a very cheap marker, we'd stay under budget. If we switch for an expensive one, we could go over.

Since (1) and (2) are redundant, having both of them doesn't help answer the question, either.

The answer is E.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
we can do one step more before we plug in specific numbers
5x+3y<10
whether
4x+4y<10
the change between two expression is
y-x
if y-x is big, 10 usd is not enough, if y-x is small, 10 usd is enough. we plug in the specific number now
supose y=3
from the first expression, 5x <10-3*3, x<0.2
from the second expression
y=3 can not satifies expression 2.
if y=1
then we can see that both expression are good.

so, answer is E
User avatar
kornn
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 357
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 357
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:

Given: 5x + 3y <= 10 .... (I)
Question: Is 4x + 4y <=10 ?....(II)

Statement (1) x < 1.
If x is a little less than 1 but almost 1, then 5x is little less than 5. Putting in (I) above, we get that y is less than \(\frac{5}{3}\).
Dear IanStewart,

I'm not sure whether the highlighted part (written by Karishma) is valid. It seems that she subtracted 5x < 5 from (I).
I don't think that is allowed, right? (as picture attached herein) Please confirm.

Quote:
Statement (2) x < \(\frac{10}{11}\)
If x is a little less than 10/11 but almost 10/11, then 5x is little less than 50/11. Putting in (I) above, we get that y is less than \(\frac{20}{11}\).
Again, I'm not sure whether this is valid for the very same reason above.

Quote:
Note: You didn't actually need to calculate the data in the second statement. This is because, if we compare 5x + 3y with 4x + 4y, the x term has reduced but the y term has increased. If x is as great as possible, it will keep y small and the extra y in second statement may not matter. We tried with x a little less than 1 in first statement. In second statement, x is smaller than 10/11. Hence, if first statement was not sufficient, no way could the second statement be sufficient.
I completely lost in this part. If in the second statement x is smaller, then y could be larger. Why don't we need to check? I don't get the reasoning behind it.

Looking forward to your awesome method sir :please:
Attachments

inequality.PNG
inequality.PNG [ 198.2 KiB | Viewed 16755 times ]

User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,989
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,989
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
varotkorn

I'm not sure whether the highlighted part (written by Karishma) is valid. It seems that she subtracted 5x < 5 from (I).
I don't think that is allowed, right? (as picture attached herein) Please confirm.

First, you cannot directly subtract inequalities that face the same way (you can, in theory, learn some useless rules about how to subtract them if they face in opposite directions, but there's no reason to learn those if you know how to add inequalities correctly), so your screenshot is giving good advice about that. But that's not what Karishma is doing. She is just working out, when notepads cost almost $1, what the maximum price of markers could be.

But if we know that 5 notepads and 3 markers cost $10, and we want the maximum possible value for the cost of 4 notepads and 4 markers, we don't want to maximize the cost of notepads. We want to minimize the cost of notepads. It's probably easier to see why that's true with simpler numbers. If I tell you x and y are positive integers, and

x + y = 10

and I ask for the maximum possible value of 2y, we don't get that by maximizing x. We get that value by minimizing x, so it contributes as little as possible to the sum "x + y = 10" and y therefore contributes as much as possible to that sum. We get the maximum value of 2y when x = 1, and then 2y = 18.

In this question, we're comparing what happens when we buy 5 notepads and 3 markers with what happens when we buy 4 notepads and 4 markers. So we're just replacing one notepad with one marker, and the total cost will go up if markers cost more than notepads. We know 5 notepads and 3 markers cost at most $10. Let's say they cost exactly $10. We'll get the maximum possible price of 4 notepads and 4 markers if markers are as expensive as possible, so if notepads are as cheap as possible. If notepads are free, then each marker costs $10/3, and 4 notepads and 4 markers can cost as much as $40/3 = $13.3333... That's the maximum possible price here of 4 markers and 4 notepads, using both Statements.

There's no need to really do any of that though - I wrote a long reply to answer your questions. If I were solving this problem, I'd just say "using both statements, markers and notepads can both be free, and then the answer is 'yes', or notepads can be free and markers can cost $3 and then the answer is 'no', so the answer is E".
User avatar
kornn
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 357
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 357
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear IanStewart,

If I were to switch the 2 conditions in question stem as highlighted:

Quote:
At a certain bookstore, each notepad costs x dollars and each markers costs y dollars. If $10 enough to buy 4 notepads and 4 markers, is $10 enough to buy 5 notepads and 3 markers instead?

(1) Each notepad cost less than $1
(2) $10 is enough to buy 11 notepads

Would the answer to the above modified question be D?
Here we would want to MAXIMIZE the cost of notepads because the number of notepads is increased from 4 to 5, right?

IMO, Karishma's approach would make more sense in this question, right?
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,989
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,989
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, that's exactly right.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,589
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,589
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts