It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 04:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4420

Kudos [?]: 8428 [3], given: 102

Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2016, 13:45
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (00:55) correct 34% (01:15) wrong based on 272 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with his extraordinary intuition in negotiations, he would not have needed such a brilliant expert in finance as his CFO.

(A) Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with his extraordinary intuition in negotiations

(B) If the Boustrophedon’s CEO’s quantitative skills equaled his extraordinary negotiation intuition

(C) In the case that the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO were comparable to his extraordinary skill of using intuition in negotiations

(D) If Boustrophedon’s CEO’s skills for quantitative material were on par to his extraordinary intuition in negotiations

(E) If the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO were a comparable ability for his extraordinary intuition in negotiations


The past perfect tense can be tricky, especially in some of its more sophisticated uses. For a complete discussion, as well as the OE of this particular question, see
Past Perfect on GMAT Sentence Correction

Mike :-)
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Kudos [?]: 8428 [3], given: 102

Magoosh Discount CodesEMPOWERgmat Discount CodesJamboree Discount Codes
Top Contributor
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4287

Kudos [?]: 7876 [1], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2017, 20:59
1
This post received
KUDOS
Top Contributor
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Quote:
Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with his extraordinary intuition in negotiations, he would not have needed such a brilliant expert in finance as his CFO.

(A) Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with his extraordinary intuition in negotiations

(B) If the Boustrophedon’s CEO’s quantitative skills equaled his extraordinary negotiation intuition

(C) In the case that the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO were comparable to his extraordinary skill of using intuition in negotiations

(D) If Boustrophedon’s CEO’s skills for quantitative material were on par to his extraordinary intuition in negotiations

(E) If the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO were a comparable ability for his extraordinary intuition in negotiations

This is a classic conditional 3 type, in which when the past perfect tense such as 'had been' is used in the conditional clause, one has to follow it up with a perfect conditional namely ' would + have ' format in the main clause. Reversely, when the perfect conditional namely 'would have ' is used in the main clause, one has to look forward to the past perfect in the conditional clause. Any other simple past will not work with the 'would have' structure in conditional sentences.
As per the above template,

[/color](A) Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with his extraordinary intuition in negotiations --- The past perfect in the conditionals is the perfect foil for the 'would have' in the main clause. -- Correct choice.

(B) If the Boustrophedon’s CEO’s quantitative skills equaled his extraordinary negotiation intuition -- equaled is simple past and does not go with the 'would have'

(C) In the case that the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO were comparable to his extraordinary skill of using intuition in negotiations--- were comparable is simple past, incompatible with the ' would have' in the main

(D) If Boustrophedon’s CEO’s skills for quantitative material were on par to his extraordinary intuition in negotiations -- were on par is incompatible-- same error as in B and C

(E) If the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO were a comparable ability for his extraordinary intuition in negotiations -- 'were a comparable' is simple past and per se wrong as per the format of conditional 3 type.

Beautiful concept, thanks to Mike
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7876 [1], given: 363

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jul 2016
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 235

Re: Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2017, 07:25
it will be of great help if you post SC qns more frequently as nowadays there many qns on gmatclub which are not gmat like and misguide the students.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 235

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Mar 2017
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2017, 02:12
This is a sub-600 level question.
Btw, the answer is 'A'

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: Enjoying the Journey
Affiliations: ND
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 60

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 193

Schools: Rotman '21
WE: Marketing (Consulting)
Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2017, 02:01
1
This post received
KUDOS
KDPathak33 wrote:
This is a sub-600 level question.
Btw, the answer is 'A'


Hi KDPathak33 ,

I think it's a bit more advanced than sub-600 :-)
_________________

"Giving kudos" is a decent way to say "Thanks" and motivate contributors. Please use them, it won't cost you anything

High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation Charles Kettering
If we chase perfection we can catch excellence Vince Lombardi

GMAT Club Live: 5 Principles for Fast Mathles for Fast Math: https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-club-live-5-principles-for-fast-math-251028.html#p1940045
YouTube sessions by GMATNinja: https://gmatclub.com/forum/verbal-live-with-gmat-ninja-sc-pronouns-that-parallelism-250568.html#p1936104
The Best SC strategies - Amazing 4 videos by Veritas: https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-best-sc-strategies-amazing-4-videos-by-veritas-250377.html#p1934575

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 193

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 166

Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 3
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2017, 05:29
Hello Mike,
Could you please explain it a bit more why B is wrong ans A is correct?
Thanks in advance.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When nothing seem to help, I would go and look at a Stonecutter hammering away at his rock perhaps a hundred time without as much as a crack showing in it.
Yet at the hundred and first blow it would split in two.
And I knew it was not that blow that did it, But all that had gone Before
.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 166

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
D
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 896

Kudos [?]: 420 [1], given: 111

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2017, 07:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
Prashant10692 wrote:
Hello Mike,
Could you please explain it a bit more why B is wrong ans A is correct?
Thanks in advance.


Hi Prashant10692,

Sorry not Mike here :D but Here are my 2 cents :

A Vs B:

Verb Tense Issue in B:

The verb used in the if clause here has to be according to main clause, which is NON UNDERLINED.

When If clause uses PAST PERFECT (verb - HAD) then main clause has to use WOULD HAVE/COULD HAVE/MIGHT HAVE. choice A correctly uses "HAD".

Choice B uses Past tense (verb - equaled) for if clause and that is wrong. It could be correct if main clause had used COULD/WUOLD.

Modifier issue in B:

In choice A extraordinary (adjective) correctly modifies intution (NOUN), which is modified by "in negotiations" (a prepositional phrase - here as an adjective phrase)
so simply noun is modified by two adjectives and that is correct. so meaning wise this modification makes sense.

in choice B extraordinary (adjective) incorrectly modifies negotiation and two nouns "negotiations & intution" are placed together. So complete nonsensical meaning because of wrong modification.

Hope this helps you :)
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Kudos [?]: 420 [1], given: 111

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4420

Kudos [?]: 8428 [1], given: 102

Re: Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2017, 14:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Prashant10692 wrote:
Hello Mike,
Could you please explain it a bit more why B is wrong ans A is correct?
Thanks in advance.

Dear Prashant10692

I see that HKD1710 already chimed in, but I will add a few additional thoughts. I'm happy to respond. :-)

First of all, I would call the verb tense in (B) "fishy"--it's not black-and-white incorrect, but it's suspect. That's problem #1.

I would disagree with part of what HKD1710 said about "extraordinary negotiation intuition." First of all, in some context, it's appropriate to have [noun #1][noun #2], and it's understood that the first noun plays the role of a modifier.
"a fire truck"
"he's a baseball guy"
"a tree specialist"
This structure is very common in casual English conversation, but it's not always inappropriate in a formal academic content. Usually, though, the first noun, the noun in the role of modifier, is a short noun, a common noun. It sounds inherently awkward to have a long four-syllable formal-sounding noun in this role. Tacking on a long adjective in front of it makes it even worse: "extraordinary negotiation intuition." That's very awkward sounding: that's problem #2.

Then, in my mind, the crowning-jewel problem: it sounds sloppy and awkward to have a series of possessives:
[noun #1's](noun #2's][noun #3] = very awkward
This is precisely what we have in the structure: "the Boustrophedon’s CEO’s quantitative skills." Yuck! Very awkward! That's problem #3, perhaps the biggest problem.

With all three of those, it's very clear that (B) cannot be the answer.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Kudos [?]: 8428 [1], given: 102

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 166

Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 3
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2017, 23:06
Yes sir.
Thank you so much for such an amazing explanation.

p.s I am really a big ban of your CR stories. The way you connect the CR argument to a normal daily life scenario,by adding a context to it, is really superb.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When nothing seem to help, I would go and look at a Stonecutter hammering away at his rock perhaps a hundred time without as much as a crack showing in it.
Yet at the hundred and first blow it would split in two.
And I knew it was not that blow that did it, But all that had gone Before
.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 166

Re: Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi   [#permalink] 15 Oct 2017, 23:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Had the quantitative skills of Boustrophedon’s CEO been on par with hi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.