It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 05:20

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 450

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 6

Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2008, 14:20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 14 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personality types, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals.
Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?
(A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type.
(B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts.
(C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it.
(D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology.
(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 6

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1632

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Location: Southern California
Schools: Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2008, 14:26
Nihit wrote:
Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personality types, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals.
Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?
(A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type.
(B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts.
(C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it.
(D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology.
(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.


E
_________________

Check out the new Career Forum
http://gmatclub.com/forum/133

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2008, 17:14
Nihit wrote:
Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personality types, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals.
Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?
(A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type. <-- This is opposite to what we want
(B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts. <-- not mentioned in any premise
(C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it. <-- again not mentioned in any premise
(D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology. <-- not mentioned anywhere
(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation. <-- Thats it !!

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2008, 17:41
Nihit wrote:
Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personality types, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals.
Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?
(A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type.
(B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts.
(C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it.
(D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology.
(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.


I picked E and must admit that it took me a while.
It us the only one that is possible.

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1881

Kudos [?]: 1403 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2008, 18:21
[quote="Nihit"]Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personality types, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals.
Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?
(A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type.
(B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts.
(C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it.
(D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology.
(E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.[/quote]

I negated E, there is no effect on the conclusion. But the conclusion will fall apart if I negate A. Furthermore, "choice of occupation" in E and "occupation" in text are different.

A should be answer!
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1403 [0], given: 1

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1632

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Location: Southern California
Schools: Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 May 2008, 18:35
OA is E
_________________

Check out the new Career Forum
http://gmatclub.com/forum/133

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 54 [3], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2008, 00:45
3
This post received
KUDOS
HWA = Hand writing analysis
P = Personality
PO = Predicting Occupations

Since, HWA has no correlation with P.
HWA <----|----> P

Similarly from conclusion.
HWA <----|----> PO

This will happen only if P and PO are co-related. Or P<--->PO.

Straight E

Kudos [?]: 54 [3], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2008
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2008, 00:54
WHERE CAN i FIND THIS SORT OF APPROACH TO ATTACK cr QUESTIONS?

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 54 [2], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2008, 00:55
2
This post received
KUDOS
This kind of approaches are detailed well in CR Bible Book. Try Esnips.com to locate this. You will easily find it.

:lol:
Cheers

Kudos [?]: 54 [2], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 74

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jan 2009, 04:19
its E

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Oct 2016
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Dec 2016, 21:05
Experts post your answers please

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way   [#permalink] 01 Dec 2016, 21:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Handwriting analysis also known as graphology is a poor way

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.