hbs.aspirant
djhouse81
As an adcom, I would be tremendously impressed by your eagerness to attend Chicago that you show by traveling all the way from Australia.
I think we are making some assumptions here, "eagerness" is not in the selection criteria. Keeping myself in an ideal adcom's shoes, visit to Chicago in itself would not have any influence on your decision, an stellar interview performance definitely will.
Well, that's my opinion, and my stronger opinion is that you should seek Rhyme's inputs. Real world is often different from "ideal" world.
I did not say it was a selection criteria, it is a tactic that can help separate you during the admissions process. Adcoms want to create a class of unique, strong students who are eager to attend school X. Take two identical candidates--interview, stats, and all. However, one has more interest in the school than the other, and shows it. Who do you think the adcom is going to remember, connect more with, and want to admit? It may separate you from that candidate who will fill the role that you fill within the class. That's why visiting schools, attending receptions, conversing with adcoms, etc, can make a difference. It is not part of the selection criteria, hence it is not a deal breaker if you do not visit schools. But, you better believe that if you create a rapport with members of the admissions staff, they are going to want you around come Fall semester, as long as you can show you are strong candidate through the established selection criteria.
Like I said before, if bsd cannot go to the States, which he cannot, it will not be a deal breaker by any means. No adcom would in their right mind expect that from him. However, interviewing at Chicago is just one route to making that connection with the school and showing one's eagerness to connect with the school.