Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 17:19 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 17:19

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 247 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
WE:Consulting (Education)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 247 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
WE:Consulting (Education)
Send PM
Re: High verbal but Low Quant Score [#permalink]
ankita21cen wrote:
Would like to mention it again that i m applying for phd in management and not mba and have heard their Adcom's criteria is quite different.


Wow - totally overlooked that! Glad you mentioned it again. The adcoms do look for very different things for PhD candidates. It's both easier, and more difficult, to get into a doctoral program: Easier, because if you're here on the GMAT Club forums that means you're doing your research into how to write your application, and often applicants do a real sucky job on their SOPs; also there's a lot less competition, without nearly the volumes of applications that the MBA programs receive, so you have a better chance of standing out; more difficult because there's not nearly as many spots available either.

On your college GPA, how did you come up with those numbers? We're a little nervous about how high you're reporting - not because we're doubting your performance in school, but because those are both very high GPAs and very few people end up with grades that high. It's tricky to convert grades from the different Indian systems so you need to be cautious. We're not familiar with many Indian schools that report academics in the 4.0 scale so we're guessing that you converted this yourself. Did you have WES or another service do it? If so then you're fine, if not, just be careful; you should be conservative with this, it can look really bad if you tell the adcom your grades were X and then end up being Y.

Whether your current GMAT is actually going to be strong enough really depends on which specific doctoral program you're talking about. We have to backtrack on what we said before - and apologies for not reading your original post carefully enough (what you're going for is really rare around here so we didn't even notice the bit about PhD in the first read, we just assumed you're doing MBA like everyone else). Hate to punt on this but we really would need to know the specifics of your background, and which schools/programs, before commenting further - it would be irresponsible of us to make any categorical statements at this point without getting those details. It's possible that everything we said initially is still spot-on accurate but we honestly can't say for sure without digging in. You can try PMing us with more if you don't want to post publicly but really, this is the type of situation that would benefit from our personalized assessment service called the Comprehensive Profile Review (sorry for the upsell, but yours is an unusual case).

EssaySnark
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: High verbal but Low Quant Score [#permalink]
thanks for the prompt reply !

yes i converted my scores using WES evaluation service ! and thanks for the link of personalised review! Efforts much appreciated xx
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: High verbal but Low Quant Score [#permalink]
Quote:
aug 2011 total 660 81% Q 47 76% V 34 68% aa 5.5

april 2012 total 720 94% Q 47 76% V 42 95% aa 4.5


Can someone explain the giant shifts in percentiles vs V/Qxx in only 8 months?
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 247 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
WE:Consulting (Education)
Send PM
Re: High verbal but Low Quant Score [#permalink]
MadCowMartin wrote:
Quote:
aug 2011 total 660 81% Q 47 76% V 34 68% aa 5.5

april 2012 total 720 94% Q 47 76% V 42 95% aa 4.5


Can someone explain the giant shifts in percentiles vs V/Qxx in only 8 months?


Hey MadCowMartin - not sure if you're reading the data right. Those scores are:
Aug 2011 - 660 / 81%
Q47 / 76%
V34 / 68%

Apr 2012 - 720 / 94%
Q47 / 76%
V42 / 95%

As of this moment (July 2013), a 47Q actually represents the 73rd percentile, and 42V is now 96%, so those have shifted. The percentiles that the OP reported were at the time of their respective tests. The changes occur when more people take the test; percentiles are recalculated based on the recent crop of test-takers. Recalcs used to happen about once a year but after IR was launched last June, the GMAC released recalcs more often as they acquired a larger population of tests with the IR component included.

Hope this helps, but let us know if we misunderstood your question entirely. :-)
EssaySnark
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: High verbal but Low Quant Score [#permalink]
essaysnark wrote:
MadCowMartin wrote:
Quote:
aug 2011 total 660 81% Q 47 76% V 34 68% aa 5.5

april 2012 total 720 94% Q 47 76% V 42 95% aa 4.5


Can someone explain the giant shifts in percentiles vs V/Qxx in only 8 months?


Hey MadCowMartin - not sure if you're reading the data right. Those scores are:
Aug 2011 - 660 / 81%
Q47 / 76%
V34 / 68%

Apr 2012 - 720 / 94%
Q47 / 76%
V42 / 95%

As of this moment (July 2013), a 47Q actually represents the 73rd percentile, and 42V is now 96%, so those have shifted. The percentiles that the OP reported were at the time of their respective tests. The changes occur when more people take the test; percentiles are recalculated based on the recent crop of test-takers. Recalcs used to happen about once a year but after IR was launched last June, the GMAC released recalcs more often as they acquired a larger population of tests with the IR component included.

Hope this helps, but let us know if we misunderstood your question entirely. :-)
EssaySnark


Thank you for your reply EssaySnark,

I did misread, sorry for that. I read it as:

August 2011:
Q47 - 81%
V34 - 76%
aa 5.5 - 68%

April 2012
Q47 - 94%
V42 - 76%
aa. 4.5 - 95%

Very stupid interpretation now that I think of it, I guess my brain was drained from taking the GMAT yesterday. Luckily my reading comprehension was better on the test (V40), lol!

Still interesting to read about the change regarding IR tho :)
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 247 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
WE:Consulting (Education)
Send PM
Re: High verbal but Low Quant Score [#permalink]
Q40 is good!! Congrats on that!

And we're happy to shed some light on the mysteries of GMAT scoring. :-)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: High verbal but Low Quant Score [#permalink]
Moderator:
Founder
37311 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne