Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
What we need to weaken: The down economy and not the Miami$50 website is responsible for majority of the decline in hotel room bookings.
What the correct weakener needs to convey: Miami$50 website may have been responsible for majority of the decline in hotel room bookings.
Why Choice D fails: Higher profit from renting out apartments does not indicate that the website may have been responsible for majority of the decline in hotel room bookings.
Why your reasoning is incorrect: In CR correct answers cannot be based on assumptions. A correct weakener will always weaken the conclusion.
Your reasoning here requires multiple assumptions: * Miami$50 promoted apartments more because of higher profits * This promotion led people to rent apartments instead of hotels * This caused the decline And that is why this reasoning is flawed.
Hope that answers your query.
Vibhatu
In D why profits are out of scope? Maybe website make bigger profit through apartments so they promote it so people rent it more than the hotel rooms?