Hi there,
I have to disagree quite strongly with Rich on this one. Pacing issues absolutely do exist on their own, and getting better at the material will not necessarily solve them. Because the test is adaptive, as you get stronger the test gets harder. It's actually quite common for people to get worse at timing as their studies progress. Initially there are many questions you don't know how to handle. As you get more confident, you feel that you can solve a larger and larger proportion of the questions, and you end up falling behind the clock. This wreaks havoc on your score!
A few tips:
1) Make timing a part of your daily practice. Do your OG practice problems timed, ideally in small sets. Then when you go back to review (and you should review every problem), make sure to think about how you could have solved the problem more efficiently. You might also discover other ways to solve the problem that do *not* seem as efficient. Figuring out why one approach works and the other doesn't on a particular problem can be a huge part of your progress. You should also look at how you did on the timed set as a whole. Did you budget your time well? If you ran a little long on a problem, did it pay off? Were you able to make that time up? If you decided to guess and move on, was that problem as tough as it looked?
2) Accept that you are going to miss problems. A lot of problems. Even at high levels of performance, it's normal to miss 30%-40% of the quant problems. Don't be stubborn and hold on to problems that aren't going well. Learn to identify tough problems, or problems that aren't working out, and let them go (with a random guess or an educated one). Again, make this kind of decision-making part of your daily practice and review. If you are using Manhattan CATs, try going into a section and sorting it by time spent. You may find it enlightening! Most people find that their 3+ minute problems are mostly incorrect anyway, so it makes no sense to spend that time. Even if you are mostly getting those long problems right, chances are there's a long string of missed problems at the other end of the scale--problems you just didn't have time to solve, even though some of them were probably on the easy side!
3) Work efficiently. Are you writing too much down? Are you rushing into the answer choices or the DS statements before you really know what you're looking for? Are you doing a bunch of arithmetic when an estimate would do the job? Just like a manager looking to improve the operations of your company, look for little ways to make your process faster. It doesn't matter if you got the problem right or wrong--could you have done it more efficiently?
Perhaps most importantly . . .
4) Commit to never run out of time on a test again. I mean it. Never! This isn't a footrace. Timing is under your complete control. You decide when to move on and when to stay with a problem, so you can decide to avoid timeouts by moving on when needed. To this end, it may help to use a system of benchmarks to check in on time. The link below details the approach we typically recommend. Whatever method you use, the key is to *enforce* it. If you've fallen behind, catch back up by dropping a problem here and there. Don't tell yourself that you'll catch up later. You won't! If the benchmarks below aren't strict enough, you can take the extreme approach: write down the remaining time at the beginning of each problem, so that you know exactly when your two minutes are up! Most people don't need to go this far, but it's far better than crashing on time at the end of a section. Again, if you're using our CATs, you can see exactly how your score plummets as you miss that string of questions at the end. That is no way to perform up to your potential!
Good luck!
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/blog ... tch-paper/