GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 30 May 2020, 23:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# I recently doubled my salary by taking a new job. I ve been

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Affiliations: PMI, ASQ
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 102
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
I recently doubled my salary by taking a new job. I ve been  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2012, 08:39
3
6
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (01:21) correct 59% (01:31) wrong based on 552 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

I recently doubled my salary by taking a new job. I’ve been working at a company for two days and now realize that the company’s workers are mean-spirited and egotistical. I have decided that high paying companies have unfriendly employees.

Which of the following, if true, would weaken the above conclusion?

A. The work environment brings out the worst in people.
B. The company has 150,000 employees.
C. Salary is more important than work environment.
D. The benefits of the new job outweigh the unfriendly people.
E. Egotistical workers can often outperform less self-confident employees.

_________________
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 300

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2012, 12:48
14
I don't want to sound like a grumpy old man here, but the reason for practice questions is so that they can help us out test day. Questions that are nothing like you will see on the test, especially in terms of the logic used, can only hurt you. This question fails on so many levels .

1) The GMAT does not sound like it was written by a whiny high school student.

2) The answers are the soul of the question. To do well on the GMAT you have to determine between carefully worded answers. Every answer in this question is out of scope (and (A) just sounds like a bad cliche ).

3) The answer is silly. Basically, if you work for a really big company (150,000) you can't make any generalizations about its employees because there is no way you can meet that many people in two days.

The only reason I am saying all this is I want people to spend time on material that will help them, not hurt them .
_________________
Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

##### General Discussion
Manager
Status: Juggg..Jugggg Go!
Joined: 11 May 2012
Posts: 167
Location: India
GC Meter: A.W.E.S.O.M.E
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V30
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2012, 09:11
Oops! I dont get the logic.. Only way of arriving at b is to negate the rest... as either strengthen or out of scope
Retired Moderator
Affiliations: PMI, ASQ
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 102
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2012, 09:22
1
asax wrote:
Oops! I dont get the logic.. Only way of arriving at b is to negate the rest... as either strengthen or out of scope

Yeah, this one kicked my butt.
How many employees in a 150k employee pool do you expect to meet in 2 days? I gave out the explanation in the subject line

Source:800Score
_________________
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 113

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2012, 21:39
1
Since the person has been in the office for just 2 days and might have met a subset of total employees in the company, it is wrong to conclude that high paying companies have unfriendly employees.

A very good question. Thank you.
Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 873
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2012, 18:59
1
+1 B

Because the author has been working just two days in that company, it is very likely that his or her sample is not representative.

What is the source of this question?
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 2089

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2012, 11:08
I agree completely with Chris - this is a really bad question. Not only is the writing awful, but the question makes no logical sense. The argument itself says "the company’s workers are mean-spirited and egotistical". If that's stated in the stem of a real GMAT question, then that is a *premise*. It cannot be wrong. So it makes no difference if the company employs 15 people or 150,000 people -- the question has told us that it is an absolutely true fact that the employees of this company are "mean-spirited and egotistical", no matter how many of them there are. So B is not the correct answer here.

The logical problem with the argument, if we accept its premises to be true, is that it draws a conclusion about *all* companies from this one company. So we should be looking for an answer choice which suggests a reason why this one company might be different from other companies. None of the answers really do that, but the only one I could even tenuously justify is A -- perhaps this company differs from others because it has a worse work environment. But the question is just so badly written to begin with that it's a pointless exercise trying to find a good answer.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Montreal

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3488

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2012, 11:26
I say far and wide what Chris said

Unfortunately on this and other boards nobody hears me. People seems more interested to do a bunch of practice questions BUt what is really important is to dissect the argument and really understand the situation.

You can even do 10 questions for type and score at the best.

Best Regards
_________________
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 94
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE: Information Technology (Retail)

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2012, 10:12
I recently doubled my salary by taking a new job. I’ve been working at a company for two days and now realize that the company’s workers are mean-spirited and egotistical. I have decided that high paying companies have unfriendly employees.

Which of the following, if true, would weaken the above conclusion?

A. The work environment brings out the worst in people.
B. The company has 150,000 employees.
C. Salary is more important than work environment.
D. The benefits of the new job outweigh the unfriendly people.
E. Egotistical workers can often outperform less self-confident employees.

Although, I agree with the experts here, I'd just add my thoughts !

This is a typical sampling weakening question . The person has concluded that the company has unfriendly employees only on the basis of a subset of people.
Therefore, this subset does not represent all the workers.

Hence B.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 58
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.62
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: I recently doubled my salary by taking a new job. I ve been  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2014, 23:53
Why doesnt the moderator delete such questions?
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Re: I recently doubled my salary by taking a new job. I ve been  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2015, 04:58
Well even if you work in a Company for 30 years you will not meet a representative sample of people. The alleged explanation does not make sense
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9042
Re: I recently doubled my salary by taking a new job. I ve been  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2019, 02:39
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: I recently doubled my salary by taking a new job. I ve been   [#permalink] 05 Aug 2019, 02:39