Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 05:21 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 05:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,720
Own Kudos:
810,375
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105,797
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,720
Kudos: 810,375
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,720
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,797
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,720
Kudos: 810,375
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,720
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,797
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,720
Kudos: 810,375
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ankitsethia96
Joined: 10 Nov 2024
Last visit: 24 Jun 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
13
 [2]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
Posts: 10
Kudos: 13
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question;
Adding my two cents to the explanation given-
(i) We need to see value of squadrons and corresponding value of planes

(ii)Since coastline is mentioned, our thought should go for anything related to coast or water or marine. Here we are given info about hydro-bombing/pursuit/torpedo. Now we need to compare Belgium vs franch values.

(iii)Compare values of offensive roles vs defensive roles. We can only find 1 defensive role i.e. Defense pursuit while Rest are offensive. And majority of sqadrons are allocated to offensive roles.

thanks

Bunuel
Official Solution:
Bunuel

The table provides selected information regarding air force deployments for certain Allied countries during World War II.

SpecialtyNationSquadronsPlanes
Artillery observationFrance60360
Artillery observationBelgium1060
AttackFrance82492
AttackBelgium1060
Day- and night-bombingFrance108648
Day- and night-bombingBelgium1272
Defense pursuitFrance100600
Defense pursuitBelgium1272
Hydro-bombingFrance20120
Hydro-bombingBelgium00
Hydro-pursuitFrance60360
Hydro-pursuitBelgium1060
Hydro-torpedoFrance636
Hydro-torpedoBelgium00
Attack pursuitFrance2201,320
Attack pursuitBelgium26156
Strategical reconnaissanceFrance38228
Strategical reconnaissanceBelgium212
Tactical reconnaissanceFrance102612
Tactical reconnaissanceBelgium1696


For each of the following statements select Would help explain if the information would, if true, help to explain some of the information in the table. Otherwise, select Would not help explain.


Would help explainWould not help explain
There was a fixed number of planes per squadron determined by Allied generals for the duration of World War II.
At the time of World War II, Belgium's coastline was approximately 2% the length of France's coastline.
Air warfare during World War II primarily focused on offensive missions rather than defensive support.


This is a rare type of table question that tests the ability to assess the plausibility of statements as potential explanations for aspects of the data. The question asks which option, if true, would help explain variations in the data across different categories. It does not claim that this has to be the definitive reason for the variation, only that it might be a possible explanation.

Statement 1:

The table shows that the number of planes per squadron is consistently 6. If this statement is true, it would explain why this pattern exists. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.

Statement 2:

According to the table, France had significantly more planes allocated to hydro, or water-based, activities compared to Belgium—86 squadrons versus 10. If Belgium's coastline was only 2% the length of France's, this would explain the disparity in the number of such aircraft. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.

Statement 3:

According to the table, more squadrons were allocated to offensive roles, such as attack, attack pursuit, hydro-pursuit, bombing (day-and-night bombing and hydro-bombing), and reconnaissance (tactical and strategical), compared to defensive roles like defense pursuit. This indicates a clear emphasis on offensive missions. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.


Correct answer:

There was a fixed number of planes per squadron determined by Allied generals for the duration of World War II. "Would help explain"

At the time of World War II, Belgium's coastline was approximately 2% the length of France's coastline. "Would help explain"

Air warfare during World War II primarily focused on offensive missions rather than defensive support. "Would help explain"
User avatar
ShilpiAgnihotrii
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 360
Location: India
Schools: ESSEC Kellogg IIM
Schools: ESSEC Kellogg IIM
Posts: 82
Kudos: 70
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Interesting question
User avatar
Dereno
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,398
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 425
Products:
Posts: 1,398
Kudos: 1,372
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question 👌🏼☺️
User avatar
OmerKor
Joined: 24 Jan 2024
Last visit: 20 Jan 2026
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
152
 [3]
Given Kudos: 150
Location: Israel
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q85 V82 DI83
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q85 V82 DI83
Posts: 129
Kudos: 152
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I agree with the first and third questions, but the second one is unclear.

As someone working in the naval field, I don’t see a direct connection between a country’s coastline length and the size of its navy. A fleet's size depends more on a country’s military strategy, economic power, and geopolitical priorities rather than the length of its shores.

For example, Russia has the longest coastline in the world (~37,653 km), yet its navy is much smaller and weaker than the U.S. Navy, despite the U.S. having a shorter coastline (~19,924 km). Similarly, Norway has an extremely long coastline (~58,133 km when including fjords and islands) but maintains a relatively small navy, whereas India, with a much shorter coastline (~7,516 km), has one of the world’s largest and most powerful navies.

On the other hand, Greece does maintain a large navy relative to its size, but that is due to its strategic needs and numerous islands, not just its coastline length. Likewise, countries like Chile, Argentina, and Brazil have long coastlines but relatively small fleets because their naval priorities differ.

Overall, I think there is no strong correlation between a country’s coastline length and the size of its navy—other factors like economic strength, military doctrine, and regional threats play a much bigger role.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,720
Own Kudos:
810,375
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,797
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,720
Kudos: 810,375
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OmerKor
Hi,

I agree with the first and third questions, but the second one is unclear.

As someone working in the naval field, I don’t see a direct connection between a country’s coastline length and the size of its navy. A fleet's size depends more on a country’s military strategy, economic power, and geopolitical priorities rather than the length of its shores.

For example, Russia has the longest coastline in the world (~37,653 km), yet its navy is much smaller and weaker than the U.S. Navy, despite the U.S. having a shorter coastline (~19,924 km). Similarly, Norway has an extremely long coastline (~58,133 km when including fjords and islands) but maintains a relatively small navy, whereas India, with a much shorter coastline (~7,516 km), has one of the world’s largest and most powerful navies.

On the other hand, Greece does maintain a large navy relative to its size, but that is due to its strategic needs and numerous islands, not just its coastline length. Likewise, countries like Chile, Argentina, and Brazil have long coastlines but relatively small fleets because their naval priorities differ.

Overall, I think there is no strong correlation between a country’s coastline length and the size of its navy—other factors like economic strength, military doctrine, and regional threats play a much bigger role.

Have you checked this:

For each of the following statements select Would help explain if the information would, if true, help to explain some of the information in the table. Otherwise, select Would not help explain.

__________________

The question asks which option, if true, would help explain variations in the data across different categories. It does not claim that this has to be the definitive reason for the variation, only that it might be a possible explanation.
User avatar
NoeticImbecile
Joined: 17 Feb 2024
Last visit: 26 Jan 2026
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 333
Posts: 66
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
for RO2, i followed the exact same approach and determined that 10 is more than 11% of 86, thus marked it as false as 2% and 11% are relatively distant. How should I approach such questions?
Bunuel
Official Solution:
Bunuel

The table provides selected information regarding air force deployments for certain Allied countries during World War II.

SpecialtyNationSquadronsPlanes
Artillery observationFrance60360
Artillery observationBelgium1060
AttackFrance82492
AttackBelgium1060
Day- and night-bombingFrance108648
Day- and night-bombingBelgium1272
Defense pursuitFrance100600
Defense pursuitBelgium1272
Hydro-bombingFrance20120
Hydro-bombingBelgium00
Hydro-pursuitFrance60360
Hydro-pursuitBelgium1060
Hydro-torpedoFrance636
Hydro-torpedoBelgium00
Attack pursuitFrance2201,320
Attack pursuitBelgium26156
Strategical reconnaissanceFrance38228
Strategical reconnaissanceBelgium212
Tactical reconnaissanceFrance102612
Tactical reconnaissanceBelgium1696


For each of the following statements select Would help explain if the information would, if true, help to explain some of the information in the table. Otherwise, select Would not help explain.


Would help explainWould not help explain
There was a fixed number of planes per squadron determined by Allied generals for the duration of World War II.
At the time of World War II, Belgium's coastline was approximately 2% the length of France's coastline.
Air warfare during World War II primarily focused on offensive missions rather than defensive support.


This is a rare type of table question that tests the ability to assess the plausibility of statements as potential explanations for aspects of the data. The question asks which option, if true, would help explain variations in the data across different categories. It does not claim that this has to be the definitive reason for the variation, only that it might be a possible explanation.

Statement 1:

The table shows that the number of planes per squadron is consistently 6. If this statement is true, it would explain why this pattern exists. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.

Statement 2:

According to the table, France had significantly more planes allocated to hydro, or water-based, activities compared to Belgium—86 squadrons versus 10. If Belgium's coastline was only 2% the length of France's, this would explain the disparity in the number of such aircraft. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.

Statement 3:

According to the table, more squadrons were allocated to offensive roles, such as attack, attack pursuit, hydro-pursuit, bombing (day-and-night bombing and hydro-bombing), and reconnaissance (tactical and strategical), compared to defensive roles like defense pursuit. This indicates a clear emphasis on offensive missions. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.


Correct answer:

There was a fixed number of planes per squadron determined by Allied generals for the duration of World War II. "Would help explain"

At the time of World War II, Belgium's coastline was approximately 2% the length of France's coastline. "Would help explain"

Air warfare during World War II primarily focused on offensive missions rather than defensive support. "Would help explain"
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,720
Own Kudos:
810,375
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,797
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,720
Kudos: 810,375
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NoeticImbecile
for RO2, i followed the exact same approach and determined that 10 is more than 11% of 86, thus marked it as false as 2% and 11% are relatively distant. How should I approach such questions?
Bunuel
Official Solution:
Bunuel

The table provides selected information regarding air force deployments for certain Allied countries during World War II.

SpecialtyNationSquadronsPlanes
Artillery observationFrance60360
Artillery observationBelgium1060
AttackFrance82492
AttackBelgium1060
Day- and night-bombingFrance108648
Day- and night-bombingBelgium1272
Defense pursuitFrance100600
Defense pursuitBelgium1272
Hydro-bombingFrance20120
Hydro-bombingBelgium00
Hydro-pursuitFrance60360
Hydro-pursuitBelgium1060
Hydro-torpedoFrance636
Hydro-torpedoBelgium00
Attack pursuitFrance2201,320
Attack pursuitBelgium26156
Strategical reconnaissanceFrance38228
Strategical reconnaissanceBelgium212
Tactical reconnaissanceFrance102612
Tactical reconnaissanceBelgium1696


For each of the following statements select Would help explain if the information would, if true, help to explain some of the information in the table. Otherwise, select Would not help explain.


Would help explainWould not help explain
There was a fixed number of planes per squadron determined by Allied generals for the duration of World War II.
At the time of World War II, Belgium's coastline was approximately 2% the length of France's coastline.
Air warfare during World War II primarily focused on offensive missions rather than defensive support.


This is a rare type of table question that tests the ability to assess the plausibility of statements as potential explanations for aspects of the data. The question asks which option, if true, would help explain variations in the data across different categories. It does not claim that this has to be the definitive reason for the variation, only that it might be a possible explanation.

Statement 1:

The table shows that the number of planes per squadron is consistently 6. If this statement is true, it would explain why this pattern exists. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.

Statement 2:

According to the table, France had significantly more planes allocated to hydro, or water-based, activities compared to Belgium—86 squadrons versus 10. If Belgium's coastline was only 2% the length of France's, this would explain the disparity in the number of such aircraft. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.

Statement 3:

According to the table, more squadrons were allocated to offensive roles, such as attack, attack pursuit, hydro-pursuit, bombing (day-and-night bombing and hydro-bombing), and reconnaissance (tactical and strategical), compared to defensive roles like defense pursuit. This indicates a clear emphasis on offensive missions. Therefore, this statement could help explain the information in the table.


Correct answer:

There was a fixed number of planes per squadron determined by Allied generals for the duration of World War II. "Would help explain"

At the time of World War II, Belgium's coastline was approximately 2% the length of France's coastline. "Would help explain"

Air warfare during World War II primarily focused on offensive missions rather than defensive support. "Would help explain"

You’re treating Statement 2 as if it required the percentages to be close for it to be relevant. That’s not what the question is asking. It’s asking whether the fact that Belgium’s coastline was much shorter could help explain why Belgium had far fewer water-based squadrons. Even if the difference is large (2% vs. 11%), that difference still supports the idea that the shorter coastline could explain the disparity in hydro-related aircraft.
User avatar
sam5996
Joined: 17 May 2025
Last visit: 19 Feb 2026
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don’t quite agree with the solution. Second should be would not help explain as we can’t say 2 percent, if less answer would have been will help understand, it can be 10 percent as well by 10. 86 difference isn’t that big
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,720
Own Kudos:
810,375
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,797
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,720
Kudos: 810,375
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sam5996
I don’t quite agree with the solution. Second should be would not help explain as we can’t say 2 percent, if less answer would have been will help understand, it can be 10 percent as well by 10. 86 difference isn’t that big

Your doubt in part is addressed above but here it is again: statement 2 is marked Would help explain because if Belgium’s coastline were only 2% of France’s, that fact could plausibly explain why Belgium had far fewer hydro squadrons. The question only asks whether the statement, if true, could explain the pattern, not whether the number itself seems realistic.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109720 posts
Founder
43142 posts