Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
53%
(03:30)
correct 47%
(02:18)
wrong
based on 53
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The graph shows state-level changes in corn and soybean acreage in the United States from January 2006 through December 2008.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
The state that experienced the second largest increase in combined corn and soybean acreage during the period shown in the graph was .
The range of change in combined corn and soybean acreage among the states during the period shown in the graph was approximately times the largest increase in soybean acreage of any state during the same period.
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the dropdowns, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Select the dropdowns, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
The graph shows state-level changes in corn and soybean acreage in the United States from January 2006 through December 2008.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
The state that experienced the second largest increase in combined corn and soybean acreage during the period shown in the graph was .
The range of change in combined corn and soybean acreage among the states during the period shown in the graph was approximately times the largest increase in soybean acreage of any state during the same period.
Show more
Drop-down 1:
First, notice that the \(x\)-axis (corn acreage) ranges from -200 to 1,400, while the \(y\)-axis (soybean acreage) ranges from -1,000 to 400. Clearly, the state that experienced the largest increase in combined corn and soybean acreage was South Dakota (SD), with a total increase of approximately 1,200 + 200 = 1,400. The second largest increase appears to be in North Dakota (ND), with a net increase of approximately 900 + (-100) = 800.
Drop-down 2:
The range of change in combined corn and soybean acreage can be found by subtracting the largest decrease from the largest increase. The largest increase, as calculated above, was for South Dakota (SD) at 1,400. The largest decrease must be for Illinois (IL), at 750 + (-950) = -200. Thus, the range of change is 1,400 - (-200) = 1,600.
The largest increase in soybean acreage was for Tennessee (TN), at approximately 350.
Therefore, the range of 1,600 is approximately \(\frac{1,600}{350} \approx 5\) times the largest increase in soybean acreage of 350.
I did not quite understand the solution. The explanation of drop down 2 is not very clear.
Show more
The question is asking about combined change, not corn alone and not soybean alone. So for each state, you first add the two coordinates: combined change = corn change + soybean change.
South Dakota has the largest combined change: about 1200 + 200 = 1400. Illinois has the smallest combined change: about 750 + (-950) = -200.
So the range of combined change is 1400 - (-200) = 1600.
Then the question compares that range to the largest soybean increase alone, which is Tennessee at about 350. Since 1600/350 is about 4.6, the answer is approximately 5.