Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 2110:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products.
May 2910:00 AM IST
-11:00 PM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
23 Sep 2025, 09:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved.: Yes
When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum.: Yes
For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar.: No
The table shows twelve reviews in which different museums considered whether to send an item to an external exhibition.
For each of the following statements, mark Yes if it is supported by the information in the table and No otherwise.
| Record | Museum Category | Outcome | Item Proposed for Loan | Reviewer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | art | approved | painting | Chief Curator |
| 2 | art | rejected | painting | Registrar |
| 3 | history | rejected | artifact | Chief Curator |
| 4 | science | approved | painting | Registrar |
| 5 | art | rejected | sculpture | Registrar |
| 6 | history | rejected | painting | Chief Curator |
| 7 | science | approved | painting | Chief Curator |
| 8 | art | rejected | artifact | Registrar |
| 9 | history | rejected | sculpture | Chief Curator |
| 10 | science | approved | painting | Chief Curator |
| 11 | art | rejected | sculpture | Chief Curator |
| 12 | history | rejected | artifact | Registrar |
For each of the following statements, mark Yes if it is supported by the information in the table and No otherwise.
| Yes | No | |
| Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved. | ||
| When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum. | ||
| For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved.: Yes
When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum.: Yes
For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar.: No
23 Sep 2025, 09:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
• Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved.
Registrar reviews: Records 2, 4, 5, 8, 12. Only Record 4 was approved; four were rejected. Rejections outnumber approvals.
Answer: Yes
• When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum.
Approved paintings: Record 1 (art), Record 4 (science), Records 7 and 10 (science). Approvals span both art and science museums.
Answer: Yes
• For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar.
Check the rejections: Records 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12. Most fit the rule because they are either sculptures/artifacts or they were rejected by a Registrar. But Records 3 and 6 are exceptions: in both, the proposed item was a painting and the reviewer was a Chief Curator. Since those two do not satisfy the condition, the statement is not correct.
Answer: No
Correct answer:
Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved. "Yes"
When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum. "Yes"
For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar. "No"
Bunuel
• Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved.
Registrar reviews: Records 2, 4, 5, 8, 12. Only Record 4 was approved; four were rejected. Rejections outnumber approvals.
Answer: Yes
• When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum.
Approved paintings: Record 1 (art), Record 4 (science), Records 7 and 10 (science). Approvals span both art and science museums.
Answer: Yes
• For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar.
Check the rejections: Records 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12. Most fit the rule because they are either sculptures/artifacts or they were rejected by a Registrar. But Records 3 and 6 are exceptions: in both, the proposed item was a painting and the reviewer was a Chief Curator. Since those two do not satisfy the condition, the statement is not correct.
Answer: No
Correct answer:
Among the reviews in which the reviewer was a Registrar, more items were rejected than approved. "Yes"
When the item proposed was a painting, the set of approvals included more than one category of museum. "Yes"
For every rejection recorded, either the proposed item was a sculpture or artifact, or the reviewer was a Registrar. "No"
