Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If 3 < x < 100, for how many values of x is x/3 the square [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Dec 2012, 06:26

Walkabout wrote:

If 3 < x < 100, for how many values of x is x/3 the square of a prime number?

(A) Two (B) Three (C) Four (D) Five (E) Nine

I think Bunnuel has given a perfect explanation that needs no further detailing.

I just want to highlight a point in these types of questions. For the questions that ask "how many values of x".. they will usually be of consecutive numbers. But when the numbers asked are primes, then it is manual counting that is required because prime numbers do not follow any standard pattern. They will definitely be countable and the total will usually be less than 25 in GMAT.
_________________

Re: If 3 < x < 100, for how many values of x is x/3 the square [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Apr 2014, 14:40

Bunuel wrote:

Walkabout wrote:

If 3 < x < 100, for how many values of x is x/3 the square of a prime number?

(A) Two (B) Three (C) Four (D) Five (E) Nine

Since \(3 < x < 100\), then \(1<\frac{x}{3}<33\frac{1}{3}\) (just divide all parts of the inequality by 3).

\(\frac{x}{3}\) should be the square of a prime number, thus \(\frac{x}{3}\) could be 2^2=4, 3^2=9, or 5^2=25.

Answer: B.

Going through the explanation, I get *why* the answer is 3 but unfortunately, I wouldn't have been able to come to that solution on my own.

If I treat this problem as substitution, i can sub x=Prime^2 * 3 and then solve but why did you take the other route? Why did you divide both sides of the inequality by 3?

If 3 < x < 100, for how many values of x is x/3 the square of a prime number?

(A) Two (B) Three (C) Four (D) Five (E) Nine

Since \(3 < x < 100\), then \(1<\frac{x}{3}<33\frac{1}{3}\) (just divide all parts of the inequality by 3).

\(\frac{x}{3}\) should be the square of a prime number, thus \(\frac{x}{3}\) could be 2^2=4, 3^2=9, or 5^2=25.

Answer: B.

Going through the explanation, I get *why* the answer is 3 but unfortunately, I wouldn't have been able to come to that solution on my own.

If I treat this problem as substitution, i can sub x=Prime^2 * 3 and then solve but why did you take the other route? Why did you divide both sides of the inequality by 3?

You should use whichever approach suits you the best and gives the correct answer in minimum time.

As for my solution, I divided by 3 because this way I directly get the range for x/3 (\(1<\frac{x}{3}<33\frac{1}{3}\)), and it becomes easier to evaluate the number of values for it.
_________________

Re: If 3 < x < 100, for how many values of x is x/3 the square [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 May 2014, 14:40

Bunuel wrote:

russ9 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Going through the explanation, I get *why* the answer is 3 but unfortunately, I wouldn't have been able to come to that solution on my own.

If I treat this problem as substitution, i can sub x=Prime^2 * 3 and then solve but why did you take the other route? Why did you divide both sides of the inequality by 3?

You should use whichever approach suits you the best and gives the correct answer in minimum time.

As for my solution, I divided by 3 because this way I directly get the range for x/3 (\(1<\frac{x}{3}<33\frac{1}{3}\)), and it becomes easier to evaluate the number of values for it.

You should use whichever approach suits you the best and gives the correct answer in minimum time.

As for my solution, I divided by 3 because this way I directly get the range for x/3 (\(1<\frac{x}{3}<33\frac{1}{3}\)), and it becomes easier to evaluate the number of values for it.

Re: If 3 < x < 100, for how many values of x is x/3 the square [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jun 2015, 17:29

I got B

x/3 = (prime)^2 x = 3(prime) ^2

The only values for x that are 3 < x < 100 are if the prime numbers are 2,3 and 5. Once you hit 7 your x value becomes greater than 100. Therefore there are only 3 values for x.

If 3 < x < 100, for how many values of x is the square of a prime number?

(A) Two (B) Three (C) Four (D) Five (E) Nine

Hi nahid78,

If your question asks how many values of x, then the answer will be 5 The values would be 4, 9, 25, 49, 81

But if you have mistyped the question and we are required to find the values of (x/3) then the values would be 12, 27, 75. Three values
_________________

Its been long time coming. I have always been passionate about poetry. It’s my way of expressing my feelings and emotions. And i feel a person can convey...

Written by Scottish historian Niall Ferguson , the book is subtitled “A Financial History of the World”. There is also a long documentary of the same name that the...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...