Hi PineToad,Good instinct to nail down the setup before trusting the count, since with-vs-without replacement completely changes a probability problem.
Here the question settles it for you with
one word: "distinct."What "distinct" forces: the
4 integers must all be different from one another. If you were choosing
with replacement, you could draw the same number twice (like
5,
5,
7,
8) - but then they wouldn't all be distinct. So "
4 distinct integers" rules replacement out. The selection is
without replacement, and order doesn't matter - you're just picking a
4-element subset.
That's exactly why the solutions you saw used
C(9,4) = 126 as the total. Combinations count unordered, no-repeat selections - which is precisely what "
4 distinct integers chosen from
1-
9" describes. If replacement were allowed, the total wouldn't be a simple
C(9,4) at all, and the favorable cases like (
1,
2,
8,
9) couldn't be listed as clean
4-number sets.
Quick way to read these cues in future:- "distinct" / "different" / "no two the same" -
without replacement- "a number is chosen, noted, and put back" or "can repeat" -
with replacementSo you're safe to trust the
14/
126 =
1/9 count - the word "distinct" already locked in the without-replacement reading before any counting began.
Answer: APineToad
Are the integers randomly chosen with or without replacement?