Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 07:58 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 07:58
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
qhoc0010
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Last visit: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 456
Own Kudos:
Posts: 456
Kudos: 1,575
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
FN
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Last visit: 07 May 2012
Posts: 1,576
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Posts: 1,576
Kudos: 675
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 697
Own Kudos:
Posts: 697
Kudos: 515
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 966
Own Kudos:
Posts: 966
Kudos: 796
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question is quite dangerous, in my mind. I used Excel to look at the series. It only gets to be smaller then 0.1 after the 63 term. I guess all we could do is to guess. If the series is ended at 49/50 instead of 99/100, then we'd be wrong. Anybody has any good way to determine that it is indeed less than 0.1 rather than by guessing?
User avatar
speedo
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Last visit: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HongHu
This question is quite dangerous, in my mind. I used Excel to look at the series. It only gets to be smaller then 0.1 after the 63 term. I guess all we could do is to guess. If the series is ended at 49/50 instead of 99/100, then we'd be wrong. Anybody has any good way to determine that it is indeed less than 0.1 rather than by guessing?


Not the 1st time me hearing these Excel goof ups!! :lol:

Just try and find out the value 3^38 using your Excel, you'll understand what I mean. :twisted: & probably stop using Excel from now on!! Use your own Quant skills, will give more accurate results.

I think fresinha12 has pretty much summed it up.

:wink:
User avatar
qhoc0010
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Last visit: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 456
Own Kudos:
Posts: 456
Kudos: 1,575
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Very good!!

OK, I guess you guys cannot wait for the OA since this one is hard. The OA is (B)

Let solve this one.

(1) With common sense, we probably can conclude right the way that this one is insufficient.
Obviously, 0 < a < 1
Also 0 < b < 1
a is a constant and b is variable so (1) will give you nothing.
b could be 0.00000000000000001 or 0.999999999999999999

(2) OK, the second one gives you the number 1/10
You may want to find out what this number is for.
If (2) is sufficient, a = 1/10 or a < 1/10

Look at the pattern in a: k/(k + 1), where k is an integer greater than 0
Let
c = 1/2 * 3/4 * ... * 97/100 (1)
-> a = c * 99/100

Notice that:
k/(k + 1) < (k + 1)/(k + 2)

Quick proof here:
k/(k + 1) < (k + 1)/(k + 2)
-> k * (k + 2) < (k + 1) * (k + 1)
-> k^2 + 2*k < k^2 + 2*k + 1
-> 0 < 1 (TRUE)

According to the inequality above:
1/2 < 2/3
1/2 * 3/4 < 2/3 * 4/5
...

We can say:
c < 2/3 * 4/5 * ... * 98/99 (2)

Multiply (1) and (2)

c^2 < 1/2 * 2/3 * ... * 97/98 * 98/99
c^2 < 1/99

-> c < 1/sqrt(99)

We have:
a = c * 99/100 <1/sqrt(99) * 99/100 = sqrt(99)/100 < 10/100 = 1/10
-> a < 1/10

WOW, done. This mean if b > 1/10, then a is always less than b since a < 1/10



By the way, I made up this question!!! :lol:
User avatar
nocilis
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Last visit: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 274
Own Kudos:
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Posts: 274
Kudos: 1,539
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
qhoc0010's answer makes sense. It is quite complicated and not possible to do in 2 minutes.
I agree with HongHu that other solutions have a leap-of-faith arguments rather than arguments with a solid justification.

In general, I am troubled by the fact that quite a few DS problems involving number theory involve such a leap-of-faith solution because we need to solve the problem in two minutes! (try three numbers, if it works, then it works, if one of them do not work, solution is not good - this is clearly a leap-of-faith)



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105420 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts