Bunuel
If a law had been passed demanding that hunters will be punished, the quagga would not have become an extinct species.
A. will be punished, the quagga would not have
B. be punished, the quagga would not
C. be punished, the quagga will not
D. be punished, the quagga would not have
E. are being punished, the quagga would not have
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
If a law had been passed demanding that hunters will be punished, the quagga would not have become an extinct species.A. will be punished, the quagga would not have
This answer choice is grammatically incorrect. Demand is one of the nine verbs to which the Subjunctive rule applies (if it is followed by that). This means that the next verb after demanding that should be in base form. However, will be punished is in the future and not in base form.
What helps us identify this question as a Subjunctive question as well as identify the mistake is the following Stop Sign:
propose/recommend/require/request/insist/suggest/mandate/ask/demand that
Whenever you come across this Stop Sign, make sure that the following verb is in its base form.B. be punished, the quagga would not
Although this answer choice corrects the original Subjunctive error by using the base form be after the verb demanding that, it creates another grammatical error.
The question begins with the condition part of a conditional sentence (If... had been passed). This part is in Past Perfect, which means that the conditional is Conditional 3. The result part of Conditional 3 sentences should be in Future Past Perfect (would + have + V3). This answer choice, however, uses Future Past (would not become), which is the tense used in the result part of Conditional 2 sentences.
What helps identify this question as a Conditionals question as well as identify the mistake is the following Stop Sign: If / UnlessC. be punished, the quagga will not
Although this answer choice corrects the original Subjunctive error by using the base form be after the verb demanding that, it creates another grammatical error.
The question begins with the condition part of a conditional sentence (If... had been passed). This part is in Past Perfect, which means that the conditional is Conditional 3. The result part of Conditional 3 sentences should be in Future Past Perfect (would + have + V3). This answer choice, however, uses Future Simple (will not become), which is the tense used in the result part of Conditional 1 sentences..
What helps identify this question as a Conditionals question as well as identify the mistake is the following Stop Sign: If / UnlessD. be punished, the quagga would not have
Demand is one of the nine verbs to which the Subjunctive rule applies (if it is followed by that). This means that the next verb after demanding that should be in base form. This answer choice correctly uses be and the Future Past Perfect (would not have become) for the result part of a Conditional 3 sentence.E. are being punished, the quagga would not have
This answer choice is grammatically incorrect. Demand is one of the nine verbs to which the Subjunctive rule applies (if it is followed by that). This means that the next verb after demanding that should be in base form. However, are being punished is not in base form.
What helps us identify this question as a Subjunctive question as well as identify the mistake is the following Stop Sign: propose/recommend/require/request/insist/suggest/mandate/ask/demand that
Whenever you come across this Stop Sign, make sure that the following verb is in its base form.