Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 07:26 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 07:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Riju1191
Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Last visit: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
6
 [6]
Posts: 2
Kudos: 6
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
778,520
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,520
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Riju1191
Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Last visit: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,520
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Riju1191
If ab<ac , which is greater b or c ?

i. a<0
2. c<0

As you said
Both a or c-b should be +ve or both should be -ve.

Let assume
a= .1 its is a positive
b = .1
c= .2

AB = .1*.1 = 0.01
AC = .1*.2 = 0.02

so ab< ac

In this case
if a < 0 and a is -ve then b>c
but if a<0 and +ve then C>b

So we are not pretty sure.. Again in the question it is not mentioned that a,b,c are integer

I think you are confused with notation: statement (1) says that \(a<0\), which means that \(a\) is negative, so it can not equal to 0.1 or any other non-negative value.
avatar
nbvasavada
Joined: 03 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi guys .... i am a beginner in prep for GMAT. I left mathematics a very very long ago ... i have a question regarding the problem...


the question itself says

ab < ac ............can't we subtract a from either side straight away which will yield ...

b < c directly from the stem itself. We have answer without any further condition. a could be anything but if ab<ac it has to as per my understanding b<c.

anyone can throw light on it ...?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,520
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nbvasavada
hi guys .... i am a beginner in prep for GMAT. I left mathematics a very very long ago ... i have a question regarding the problem...


the question itself says

ab < ac ............can't we subtract a from either side straight away which will yield ...

b < c directly from the stem itself. We have answer without any further condition. a could be anything but if ab<ac it has to as per my understanding b<c.

anyone can throw light on it ...?

I think you mean divide instead of subtract.

Never multiply or reduce (divide) inequality by an unknown (a variable) unless you are sure of its sign since you do not know whether you must flip the sign of the inequality.

So you can not divided (reduce) \(ab<ac\) by \(a\) and write \(b<c\) because you don't know whether \(a\) is positive or negative: if it's positive then you should write \(b<c\) but if its negative then you should flip the sign and write \(b>c\). Statement (1) says \(a<0\), so when reducing by \(a\) we should flip the sign and write \(b>c\).

Hope it's clear.
avatar
nbvasavada
Joined: 03 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks. Yes its clear.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
paldrich1287
Joined: 21 Jun 2012
Last visit: 09 May 2013
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Posts: 3
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(Note: I found two older topics for this question, but they were each over a year old and I assumed there were bump rules here..)

This is from Kaplan CAT3:

If ab < ac, which is greater, b or c?

(1) a < 0

(2) c < 0

Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.
Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.
EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.

I just have one issue with this problem: when I originally did it I tried picking numbers rather than just dividing by -a to get b > c. This is what I got:

(1) If a < 0, then perhaps a = -1. Then if b =3 and c=2, ab < ac and c > b. But if b = -2 and c = -3, ab < ac and b > c.
I'm not finding any rules I'm missing in the problem, so my answer was C.. or E... Why is the above reasoning wrong?

Thanks...
User avatar
Capricorn369
Joined: 11 May 2011
Last visit: 06 May 2019
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V30
Posts: 233
Kudos: 225
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
paldrich1287
(Note: I found two older topics for this question, but they were each over a year old and I assumed there were bump rules here..)

This is from Kaplan CAT3:

If ab < ac, which is greater, b or c?

(1) a < 0

(2) c < 0

Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.
Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.
EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.

I just have one issue with this problem: when I originally did it I tried picking numbers rather than just dividing by -a to get b > c. This is what I got:

(1) If a < 0, then perhaps a = -1. Then if b =3 and c=2, ab < ac and c > bBut if b = -2 and c = -3, ab < ac and b > c.
I'm not finding any rules I'm missing in the problem, so my answer was C.. or E... Why is the above reasoning wrong?

Thanks...

Above c>b in yellow is incorrect. It is c<b becasue b =3 and c=2. Hence answer is A.
User avatar
EvaJager
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 514
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
WE:Science (Education)
Posts: 514
Kudos: 2,326
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
paldrich1287
(Note: I found two older topics for this question, but they were each over a year old and I assumed there were bump rules here..)

This is from Kaplan CAT3:

If ab < ac, which is greater, b or c?

(1) a < 0

(2) c < 0

Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.
Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.
EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.

I just have one issue with this problem: when I originally did it I tried picking numbers rather than just dividing by -a to get b > c. This is what I got:

(1) If a < 0, then perhaps a = -1. Then if b =3 and c=2, ab < ac and c > b. But if b = -2 and c = -3, ab < ac and b > c.
I'm not finding any rules I'm missing in the problem, so my answer was C.. or E... Why is the above reasoning wrong?

Thanks...

\(ab<ac\) can be rewritten as \(ab-ac<0\) or \(a(b-c)<0\), which means that \(a\) and \(b-c\) have opposite signs.

(1) \(a<0\) then necessarily \(b-c>0.\)
Sufficient.

(2) \(c<0\)
Obviously not sufficient, as we know nothing about \(b.\)

Answer A.
avatar
paldrich1287
Joined: 21 Jun 2012
Last visit: 09 May 2013
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Posts: 3
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Capricorn369

Above c>b in yellow is incorrect. It is c<b becasue b =3 and c=2. Hence answer is A.

D'oh! I figured it was something very obvious.. thanks..
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,600
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,600
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,600
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,600
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105420 posts
496 posts