Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 173

If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Dec 2012, 07:56
Question Stats:
64% (01:47) correct 36% (01:52) wrong based on 2400 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ? (1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1. (2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59588

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Dec 2012, 07:59
If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1 > k is an odd number, thus it could be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Not sufficient. (2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0 > k is 1 less than a multiple of 3, thus it could be 59, 62, or 65. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) k could still take more than one value: 59 or 65. Not sufficient. Answer: E.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 02 Oct 2013
Posts: 11

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2013, 19:53
Bunuel wrote: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?
(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1 > k is an odd number, thus it could be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Not sufficient.
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0 > k is 1 less than a multiple of 3, thus it could be 59, 62, or 65. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) k could still take more than one value: 59 or 65. Not sufficient.
Answer: E. Hi Bunuel Could you please explain the last part , I am still not able to figure out how E is the answer Regards



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59588

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2013, 21:56
DivyanshuRohatgi wrote: Bunuel wrote: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?
(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1 > k is an odd number, thus it could be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Not sufficient.
(2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0 > k is 1 less than a multiple of 3, thus it could be 59, 62, or 65. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) k could still take more than one value: 59 or 65. Not sufficient.
Answer: E. Hi Bunuel Could you please explain the last part , I am still not able to figure out how E is the answer Regards From (1) k can be: 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. From (2) k can be: 59, 62, or 65. Thus k can be 59, or 65. Two different answers. Hence not sufficient.
_________________



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8235
GPA: 3.82

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jan 2016, 22:23
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ? (1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1. (2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0. In the original condition, there is 1 variable(k), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 1 equation. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make D the answer. For 1), k=2t+1=57,59,61...., which is not unique and not sufficient. For 2), k+1=3m, k=3m1=59, 62, 65, which is not unique and not sufficient. When 1) & 2), n=59,65, which is not unique and not sufficient. Therefore, the answer is E. For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $79 for 1 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2015
Posts: 22

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jan 2016, 00:55
k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66 which means k=(57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65) Now Statement 1 If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1. which means k is odd so possible values of k=(57,59,61,63,65), not sufficient
Statement 2 If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0 so the possible values of k+1 are 60,63,66 so possible values of k=(59,62,65), insufficient
Combining 1 and 2 we still get 2 values 59 and 65 so insufficient
Answer is E
Please consider a kudos if you get the explanation



Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 32
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 May 2016, 02:53
the most common mistake while solving this question is 
frm stat 1 and stat 2 people will compare the values of k = 57 59 61 63 65 (from stat 1 ) to the values of k+1 = 60 63 66 (from stat 2 )
and will end up choosing 63 as the value of K which is WRONG but from stat 2 the values of k will be 59 62 and 65.
so from 1 and 2 the values will be 59 and 65...not sufficient. answer  E



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Head GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 2809

If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 May 2016, 05:59
Walkabout wrote: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?
(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1. (2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0. Solution: We are given that k is between 56 and 66. We must determine the value of k. Statement One Alone:If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1. This means k must be an odd number. However, since 56 < k < 66, k can be any odd integer between 56 and 66, which means that k could be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65. Statement one is not sufficient to determine a value of k. We can eliminate answer choices A and D. Statement Two Alone:If k + 1 were divided by 3 the remainder would be 0. This means k + 1 is a multiple of 3. However, since 56 < k < 66, there is more than one value between 56 and 66 that, when increased by 1, will be a multiple of 3. For example, since 60, 63 and 66 are all multiples of 3, we see that k could be 59, 62 or 65. Since we have three possible values for k, statement two is not sufficient to answer the question. We can eliminate answer choice B. Statements One and Two Together:From statement one we know that k can be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65, and from statement two we know that k could be 59, 62 or 65. From the combined statements, then, k could be either 59 or 65; thus, we can’t determine a unique value for k. Statements one and two together are not sufficient to answer the question. The answer is E.
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.



Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 641

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Apr 2017, 10:50
Walkabout wrote: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value of k ?
(1) If k were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1. (2) If k + 1 were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0. k can be 57, 58,...........65 (1) K is odd because on division with 2, the remainder is 1. So k is of the form 2n+1. K can be 57, 59, 61, 63, or 65 Not sufficient BCE (2) That means k is not divisible by 3. k can be 59, 62, or 65 Not sufficient Both statement together: Statement 1: k=57, 59, 61, 63, or 65Statement 2: k= 59,62, or 65No unique value for k. E



Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 139
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Oct 2017, 07:23
The 2 options state that K and K+1 being consecutive numbers are not divisible by 2 and 3 respectively. K not divisible by 2 but K+1 is divisible by 3. This is not possible and hence the answer is straight E.



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 15661
Location: United States (CA)

If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2017, 22:17
Hi All, We're told that K is an INTEGER and that 56 < K < 66. We're asked for the value of k. This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES. 1) If K were divided by 2, the remainder would be 1. Based on the information in Fact 1, K could be 57, 59, 61, 63 or 65. Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT 2) If (K+1) were divided by 3, the remainder would be 0. Based on the information in Fact 1, (K+1) could be 57, 60, 63 or 66.... so K could be 56, 59, 62 or 65 Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT Combined, we can see that there are two possibilities that 'fit' both Facts: 59 and 65 Combined, INSUFFICIENT Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.comThe Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+ souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★ ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★



Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1414
Location: India

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2017, 23:21
somesh86 wrote: The 2 options state that K and K+1 being consecutive numbers are not divisible by 2 and 3 respectively. K not divisible by 2 but K+1 is divisible by 3. This is not possible and hence the answer is straight E. Hi Somesh86 The answer is indeed E but I have doubt in your explanation. Why is it not possible to have an integer K that is not divisible by 2, but simultaneously (K+1) to be divisible by 3. Eg, we can take K=5, here K is not divisible by 2, but K+1 = 6, IS divisible by 3.



Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2018
Posts: 26
Location: United Arab Emirates
GPA: 2.6

Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2019, 12:41
Bunuel hello, Is it not possible to use the rebuilding the remainder equation on this question?




Re: If k is an integer such that 56 < k < 66, what is the value
[#permalink]
16 Sep 2019, 12:41






