Sorry to disappoint you guys, but it seems that the answer should be E.
First of all, to solve this question, think that the best way is the graphic approach:
We all agree that (1) and (2) alone are not sufficient.
Let's combine --> draw only the X-axis. The k intercept is greater than the j intercept --> the k intercept (k1) point is right to the j intercept point (j1) --> The interception of lines is above the X-axis (point 7;2) --> it will give us only three possible ways to draw the lines:
A. j has a negative slope, k has a negative slope --> the slope of k > slope of j, (because j is closer to the vertical line);
B. j has a positive slope, k has a negative slope --> the slope of k < slope of j;
C. j has a positive slope, k has a positive slope --> the slope of k > slope of j, (because k is closer to the vertical line).
So (1)+(2) is not sufficient. Answer E.
BUT the way you were solving also should get E:
f(k) = mx + n
f(j) = tx + p
(1) The x-intercept of line k is greater than the x-intercept of line j --> 0 = mx + n; 0 = tx + p --> -n/m > -p/t or n/m < p/t --> not sufficient.
(2) Lines k and j intersect at (7, 2)
2 = 7m + n; 2 = 7t + p -->
7m + n = 7t + p --> not sufficient.
Combining the way you did:
n = 2 - 7m --> n/m = 2/m - 7
p = 2 - 7t --> p/t = 2/t - 7
n/m < p/t --> 2/m - 7 < 2/t - 7 --> 1/m < 1/t -->
(t - m)/(mt) < 0And here is the catch, from the above statement, you cannot determine whether m > t or not. (t = 1) < (m = 3) statement is true and (t = 1) > (m = -3) statement is also true.
Answer E.