It is currently 21 Feb 2018, 21:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 295
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2009, 06:38
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.
Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end.
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural.
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature.
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated.
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature.

If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?
(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.
(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life.
(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.”
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.
_________________

"CEO in making"

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 248
Re: very vague lsat qts [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2009, 08:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
Very tricky, from which source did you get such questions
My choice: C and E

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.
Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end -->out of scope
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural -->weaken
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature -->the best: digging, plowing, ... are all artificial human activities and because they are better than nature --> forming the basis for the argument
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated -->no
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature -->irrelevant

If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?
(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless -->no influence
(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life -->irrelevant
(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials -->out of scope
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.” -->no influence
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use -->the best: it helps strengthen the argument: like digging, plowing or etc, constructing building is also artificial activity but it's favorable because it helps human's life to be better
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 799
Re: very vague lsat qts [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2009, 10:35
I'd go with D and C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 295
Re: very vague lsat qts [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2009, 21:22
Gr8 ..your are bang on target ..
Why C is wrong in 2nd question ??
Minheequang wrote:
Very tricky, from which source did you get such questions
My choice: C and E

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.
Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end -->out of scope
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural -->weaken
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature -->the best: digging, plowing, ... are all artificial human activities and because they are better than nature --> forming the basis for the argument
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated -->no
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature -->irrelevant

If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?
(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless -->no influence
(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life -->irrelevant
(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials -->out of scope
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.” -->no influence
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use -->the best: it helps strengthen the argument: like digging, plowing or etc, constructing building is also artificial activity but it's favorable because it helps human's life to be better

_________________

"CEO in making"

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 248
Re: very vague lsat qts [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jun 2009, 01:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
tenaman10 wrote:
Gr8 ..your are bang on target ..
Why C is wrong in 2nd question ??
Minheequang wrote:
Very tricky, from which source did you get such questions
My choice: C and E

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.
Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end -->out of scope
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural -->weaken
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature -->the best: digging, plowing, ... are all artificial human activities and because they are better than nature --> forming the basis for the argument
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated -->no
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature -->irrelevant

If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?
(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless -->no influence
(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life -->irrelevant
(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials -->out of scope
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.” -->no influence
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use -->the best: it helps strengthen the argument: like digging, plowing or etc, constructing building is also artificial activity but it's favorable because it helps human's life to be better



C is wrong in 2nd question because it's about the fundamental aspect of the activity, not the sub-factors like: materials. Construction is itself an artificial activity, no matter what its materials are. So, C does not state the point
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 805
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: very vague lsat qts [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2009, 02:43
Minheequang wrote:
Very tricky, from which source did you get such questions
My choice: C and E

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.
Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end -->out of scope
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural -->weaken
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature -->the best: digging, plowing, ... are all artificial human activities and because they are better than nature --> forming the basis for the argument
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated -->no
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature -->irrelevant

If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?
(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless -->no influence
(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life -->irrelevant
(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials -->out of scope
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.” -->no influence
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use -->the best: it helps strengthen the argument: like digging, plowing or etc, constructing building is also artificial activity but it's favorable because it helps human's life to be better


Agree
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 30
Re: very vague lsat qts [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2009, 10:25
gud one
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 295
Re: very vague lsat qts [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2009, 08:58
Source - LSAT
Minheequang wrote:
Very tricky, from which source did you get such questions
My choice: C and E

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.
Which one of the following is an assumption made by the author of the passage?
(A) The arts of life have no useful end -->out of scope
(B) The artificial is not better than the natural -->weaken
(C) Digging, plowing, building, and wearing clothes are better than nature -->the best: digging, plowing, ... are all artificial human activities and because they are better than nature --> forming the basis for the argument
(D) The injunction to follow nature should not be violated -->no
(E) The arts of life are indirect means of following nature -->irrelevant

If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?
(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless -->no influence
(B) Harming the environment is not an end, of purpose, of the arts of life -->irrelevant
(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials -->out of scope
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.” -->no influence
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use -->the best: it helps strengthen the argument: like digging, plowing or etc, constructing building is also artificial activity but it's favorable because it helps human's life to be better

_________________

"CEO in making"

Re: very vague lsat qts   [#permalink] 26 Jun 2009, 08:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.