GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 28 Feb 2020, 03:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61544
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2020, 10:43
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

39% (02:25) correct 61% (01:48) wrong based on 23 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?

(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.
(B) Harming the environment is not an end, or purpose, of the arts of life.
(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.”
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.

_________________
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 61544
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2020, 10:44
Bunuel wrote:
If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all the arts of life? To dig, to plow, to build, to wear clothes—all are direct violations of the injunction to follow nature.

If the author’s argument were challenged on the grounds that the construction of buildings has adverse effects on the natural environment, which of the following replies might the author use to respond to the challenge logically?

(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.
(B) Harming the environment is not an end, or purpose, of the arts of life.
(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.”
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.


TWIN QUESTION: https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-the-artif ... 12479.html
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jun 2019
Posts: 17
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.69
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2020, 12:13
Answer is E
The assumption is that Artificial is better than natural. that is how activities like digging and plowing are justified - they are improving something while not aligning with nature. Now look at the options -
(A) There are human activities, such as making music, that are environmentally harmless.
Wrong logic - idea is not to compare different arts. The premise states "All arts"

(B) Harming the environment is not an end, or purpose, of the arts of life.
Irrelevant - no talk around purpose or goal of life

(C) The construction could involve the use of natural, not artificial, materials.
Irrelevant - question is not bothered about kind of materieals
(D) Constructing buildings is not an “art of life.”
Wrong - all human actions are "art of lifes" according to author
(E) Even if the natural environment is disturbed by the construction of buildings, it is improved for human use.
Right - In line with the assumption. Artificial is better than natural -> for human use; may not be for environment.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all   [#permalink] 18 Jan 2020, 12:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

If the artificial is not better than the natural, to what end are all

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne