Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2240
Location: New York City

If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 19 Feb 2014, 00:19
Question Stats:
78% (01:31) correct 22% (01:31) wrong based on 220 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on a plane, do any two of these circles intersect? (1) Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height \(2\sqrt{3}\) (2) Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line. M1402
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by bmwhype2 on 30 Oct 2007, 06:45.
Last edited by Bunuel on 19 Feb 2014, 00:19, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question, added the OA and moved to DS forum.




Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9705
Location: Pune, India

If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2014, 22:03
bmwhype2 wrote: Three circles have radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on the plane. Do any two circles intersect?
1. Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height 2*sqrt(3) 2. Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line
Can someone draw out the answer? Regards Using statement 1, make an equilateral triangle with height \(2\sqrt{3}\) which is a little more than 3.4 since \(\sqrt{3}\) is a little more than 1.7. The side of this triangle will be 4 (since \(Height = (\sqrt{3}/2) * Side = 2*\sqrt{3}\)) On any one vertex, we will have the circle with the radius 2. On another, you will have to draw a circle with radius 3 but since the length of the side is only 4, this circle will intersect the circle with radius 2. Hence, statement 1 alone is sufficient. Statement 2 doesn't tell us where the circles lie. They could lie very close to each other and intersect or very far from each other and not intersect. This statement alone is not sufficient. Answer (A) *Edited
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >




SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 1910

Re: Intersecting circles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2007, 07:01
bmwhype2 wrote: Three circles have radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on the plane. Do any two circles intersect?
1. Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height 2*sqrt(3) 2. Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line
Can someone draw out the answer? Regards
A.
height = 2sqrt3
hypoteneous = side of the eq. triangle = 4.
so clearly not.



SVP
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2240
Location: New York City

Can you explain the answer? Not sure how the height and the side of a triangle relate in finding whether the circles intersect



CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3038
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth)  Class of 2011

A
Interesting question: does "osculation" means "intersection"? I guess yes. There is one point that belong to both circles. am I right?
Attachments
GCt54757.gif [ 15.3 KiB  Viewed 7903 times ]



Director
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 590

Re: Intersecting circles
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Nov 2007, 01:26
bmwhype2 wrote: Three circles have radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on the plane. Do any two circles intersect?
1. Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height 2*sqrt(3) 2. Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line
Can someone draw out the answer? Regards
A
stat 1:
since h = 2 sqrt(3), each side = 4
If the circles don't intersect, then one of the sides will be 3+2 = 5 which is not possible. Therefore, we can determine that at least 2 of the circles intersect. Suff.
Stat 2:
This doesn't tell us anything. They could or could not intersect. Insuff.



Senior Manager
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 446
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36 GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41 GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3

Re: Three circles have radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2014, 11:42
Bunuel, Is their better way to approach this question?
_________________
Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/howtoscore750and750imovedfrom710to189016.html



Manager
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 54
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Other
GMAT Date: 07312014
GPA: 3.99
WE: Analyst (Consulting)

Re: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 May 2014, 10:40
From 1) Let "a" be the side of the Equilateral triangle. Given height = 2*3= 6 . ( height of equilater triangle with side a is sqrt(3) * a/2) ==> a= 4* sqrt(3). therefore the distance between the centers of all the three circles ,taken two at a time is = 4 * sqrt(3) . which clearly shows that the circles don't itersect. ( 4*sqrt(3) is greater than the all possible sum of the radii of the circles taken two at a time 2+3 , 1+2 , 1+3 = 5,3,4. ) Sufficient
From 2) The distance between two circles is less than 6 , which implies it may be greater than 5 or less than 5. We are not sure the circles will intersect or not . Insufficient Hence A



Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 411

If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on a plane,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Sep 2014, 06:32
If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on a plane, do any two of these circles intersect? (1) Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height 2√3. (2) Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line. Hi, can anyone show how geometry looks like for St(1), please. OE Statement (1) by itself is sufficient. From S1 we know how the circles are positioned relative to each other (we know the distances between the centers). Therefore, we can answer the question whether the circles cross or not. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. The information that is missing is the distance between the centers.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58464

Re: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Sep 2014, 07:03
goodyear2013 wrote: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on a plane, do any two of these circles intersect? (1) Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height 2√3. (2) Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line. Hi, can anyone show how geometry looks like for St(1), please. OE Statement (1) by itself is sufficient. From S1 we know how the circles are positioned relative to each other (we know the distances between the centers). Therefore, we can answer the question whether the circles cross or not. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. The information that is missing is the distance between the centers. Merging topics. Please refer to the discussion above.
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Posts: 345
Location: Netherlands
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.9
WE: Analyst (Energy and Utilities)

Re: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Mar 2015, 14:47
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: bmwhype2 wrote: Three circles have radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on the plane. Do any two circles intersect?
1. Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height 2*sqrt(3) 2. Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line
Can someone draw out the answer? Regards Using statement 1, make an equilateral triangle with side \(2\sqrt{3}\) which is a little more than 3.4 since \(\sqrt{3}\) is a little more than 1.7. On any one vertex, we will have the circle with the radius 1. On another, you will have to draw a circle with radius 3 but since the length of the side is only 3.4, this circle will intersect the circle with radius 1. Hence, statement 1 alone is sufficient. Statement 2 doesn't tell us where the circles lie. They could lie very close to each other and intersect or very far from each other and not intersect. This statement alone is not sufficient. Answer (A) Hi Karishma, The length of the side of the triangle would be 4, and not 2sqrt(3). This is the height as specified in the question. However the answer does not vary. Santora



Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Posts: 193

If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jun 2016, 00:23
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: bmwhype2 wrote: Three circles have radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on the plane. Do any two circles intersect?
1. Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height 2*sqrt(3) 2. Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line
Can someone draw out the answer? Regards Using statement 1, make an equilateral triangle with side \(2\sqrt{3}\) which is a little more than 3.4 since \(\sqrt{3}\) is a little more than 1.7. On any one vertex, we will have the circle with the radius 1. On another, you will have to draw a circle with radius 3 but since the length of the side is only 3.4, this circle will intersect the circle with radius 1. Hence, statement 1 alone is sufficient. Statement 2 doesn't tell us where the circles lie. They could lie very close to each other and intersect or very far from each other and not intersect. This statement alone is not sufficient. Answer (A) Hi VeritasPrepKarishma, As per you "length of the side is only 3.4" but according to me the lenght of side should be 4. formulae Altitude of equilateral triangle= (\sqrt{3}/2) * (side) 2\sqrt{3} = (\sqrt{3}/2) * (side) So, side= 4.. Where I am wrong..?? Please assist.
_________________
Thanks and Regards, Prakhar



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9705
Location: Pune, India

Re: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jun 2016, 21:52
PrakharGMAT wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: bmwhype2 wrote: Three circles have radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie on the plane. Do any two circles intersect?
1. Centers of the circles form an equilateral triangle with height 2*sqrt(3) 2. Centers of the circles do not lie on the same line
Can someone draw out the answer? Regards Using statement 1, make an equilateral triangle with side \(2\sqrt{3}\) which is a little more than 3.4 since \(\sqrt{3}\) is a little more than 1.7. On any one vertex, we will have the circle with the radius 1. On another, you will have to draw a circle with radius 3 but since the length of the side is only 3.4, this circle will intersect the circle with radius 1. Hence, statement 1 alone is sufficient. Statement 2 doesn't tell us where the circles lie. They could lie very close to each other and intersect or very far from each other and not intersect. This statement alone is not sufficient. Answer (A) Hi VeritasPrepKarishma, As per you "length of the side is only 3.4" but according to me the lenght of side should be 4. formulae Altitude of equilateral triangle= (\sqrt{3}/2) * (side) 2\sqrt{3} = (\sqrt{3}/2) * (side) So, side= 4.. Where I am wrong..?? Please assist. Yes, you are right. The height is given so the side will be 4. You will not be able to draw the circles with radii 2 and 3 without intersecting. The answer stays the same.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Manager
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 187
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business

Re: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Aug 2017, 07:06
I have been posting my queries but i am not receiving any reply to the same. Can someone please help me with my doubts. From the statement 1 by finding out the length of the side for equilateral triangle how can we say that they are not intersecting??



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9705
Location: Pune, India

Re: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Aug 2017, 09:35
longhaul123 wrote: I have been posting my queries but i am not receiving any reply to the same. Can someone please help me with my doubts. From the statement 1 by finding out the length of the side for equilateral triangle how can we say that they are not intersecting?? You get that the side of the equilateral triangle is 4. The centres of the 3 circles lie on the three vertices of the triangle. On any one vertex, we will have the circle with the radius 2. On another, you will have to draw a circle with radius 3 but since the length of the side is only 4, this circle will intersect the circle with radius 2. Hence two of these circles will intersect. Hence, statement 1 alone is sufficient.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13421

Re: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Mar 2019, 14:45
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: If three circles having radii 1, 2, and 3 respectively lie o
[#permalink]
08 Mar 2019, 14:45






