Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Within few seconds, I think it is D because you have 3000/6001 --> a bit less but almost equal to 1/2. C was tricky but I think it is too much below the average of 10.5
_________________

Re: If x > 3000, then the value of (x)/(2x+1) is closest to? [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Dec 2013, 10:20

cloaked_vessel wrote:

If x > 3000, then the value of (x)/(2x+1) is closest to?

A 1/6 B 1/3 C 10/21 D 1/2 E 3/2

I assumed that we could do this:

3001/(2*3001) +1 = 1/(2*1) + 1 ----> answer B

Why can we not "short" the numerator and the value of x in the denominator? Of course, I understand 3001/6003 is almost 1/2 but IMO my reasoning for B should work.. What am I missing?

If x > 3000, then the value of (x)/(2x+1) is closest to?

A 1/6 B 1/3 C 10/21 D 1/2 E 3/2

I assumed that we could do this:

3001/(2*3001) +1 = 1/(2*1) + 1 ----> answer B

Why can we not "short" the numerator and the value of x in the denominator? Of course, I understand 3001/6003 is almost 1/2 but IMO my reasoning for B should work.. What am I missing?

\(\frac{x}{2x+1}\) does not equal to \(\frac{1}{2+1}\). You cannot reduce numerator and only one term of the denominator by x.

Re: If x > 3000, then the value of (x)/(2x+1) is closest to? [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Nov 2017, 23:18

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________