It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 05:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# If xyz no= 0, is x (y + z) >= 0? (1) | y + z |=| y| +| z|

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

If xyz no= 0, is x (y + z) >= 0? (1) | y + z |=| y| +| z| [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2007, 03:19
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

If xyz no= 0, is x (y + z) >= 0?
(1) | y + z |=| y| +| z|
(2)| x + y| =| x |+ |y|

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1794

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2007, 03:34
(C) for me

x (y + z) >= 0?
<=> sign(x) = sign(x+z) ?

Stat 1
|y + z|=|y| +|z|
<=> sign(y) = sign(z) = sign(x+z)

Nothing about the sign of x.

INSUFF.

Stat 2
|x + y| =|x|+ |y|
<=> sign(x) = sign(y) = sign(x+y)

Nothing about the sign of y+z.

INSUFF.

Both 1 and 2
We have :
o sign(y) = sign(z) = sign(y+z)
o sign(x) = sign(y) = sign(x+y)

So,
sign(x) = sign(y+z) thus x*(y+z) >= 0

SUFF.

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1794

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2007, 04:28
OlgaN wrote:
I am confused with this question, because if we are asked >=, and we can prove >, but we still do not know about =, should we think that we definitely know the answer?
Thus either C or E.

But here, it cannot equal 0 .... As the signs of x, y and z are the same and they are different from 0.

So it is more > than possibly =

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1794

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2007, 05:05
OlgaN wrote:
Fig wrote:
OlgaN wrote:
I am confused with this question, because if we are asked >=, and we can prove >, but we still do not know about =, should we think that we definitely know the answer?
Thus either C or E.

But here, it cannot equal 0 .... As the signs of x, y and z are the same and they are different from 0.

So it is more > than possibly =

Agree, thanks. Those brutal DS questions - they make me to think!!!!!

It would not be the last one like this

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 0

16 Oct 2007, 05:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by