Explanation
4. The passage suggests that those who speak English attempting to communicate with those who do not speak English areExplanationThe passage states:- Symbols (like words) are conditioned stimuli.
- Successful communication depends on "complementary conditioning" or "complementary experience," meaning that both parties must have similar conditioned responses to the same symbols.
- It is obvious that expecting someone who doesn't speak English to converse in English is stupid.
- However, even among English speakers, people might not have the same conditioned responses to familiar words due to different experiences.
- Now, the question asks about those who speak English attempting to communicate with those who do not speak English.
From the passage:The passage compares shouting at non-English speakers (which is irrational) to assuming that even English speakers have complementary conditioning. This implies that communication with non-English speakers is problematic because they lack the complementary conditioning to English symbols.
Specifically, the passage says:
"successful communication depends upon complementary conditioning, or complementary experience." Without shared conditioning (which non-English speakers lack), communication fails.
Option B says: "still dependent upon complementary responses to common symbols." This aligns perfectly. Even though one party speaks English, the other does not, so they do not share the conditioned responses to English symbols. Therefore, communication is dependent on having those complementary responses, which are absent.
A. The passage doesn't say it must fail completely; it might be possible through other means, but it highlights the dependence on complementary conditioning.
C. The passage mentions shouting as an
"irrational impulse," implying it is not effective.
D. But if one doesn't speak English, there are no common English words; the vocabularies are different.
E. The passage doesn't discuss translations; it focuses on direct communication and conditioning.
Thus, the passage suggests that communication with non-English speakers is still dependent on having complementary responses to common symbols, which they lack.
Answer: B