Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 10:55 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 10:55
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
b14kumar
User avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Last visit: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 297
Own Kudos:
431
Posts: 297
Kudos: 431
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing 27 Jul 2007, 13:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have the equal legal and political right and for the changes in the women's legal properties.

(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have the equal legal and political right
(B) arguing in a treatise for the equal legal and political right for women
(C) a treatise that advocates for the women's equal legal and political right
(D) a treatise advocating for the women's equal legal and political right
(E) a treatise arguing for the women's equal legal and political right

Regards,
Brajesh



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
User avatar
Ashwin_Mohan
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Last visit: 19 Oct 2008
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
90
Posts: 105
Kudos: 90
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing 27 Jul 2007, 14:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C,

As that correctly refers to the treatise while maintaining parallelism.
User avatar
dahcrap
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Last visit: 27 May 2008
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
33
Posts: 159
Kudos: 33
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing 27 Jul 2007, 17:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I didnt like C because I didnt feel advocates for is a good idiom. Didnt sound good to my ears
User avatar
Ashwin_Mohan
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Last visit: 19 Oct 2008
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
90
Posts: 105
Kudos: 90
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing 27 Jul 2007, 17:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
isn't Argue Over the right idiom...like Debate over??? ;)...
User avatar
beckee529
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Last visit: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 393
Own Kudos:
1,975
Posts: 393
Kudos: 1,975
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing 27 Jul 2007, 22:05
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dahcrap
I didnt like C because I didnt feel advocates for is a good idiom. Didnt sound good to my ears
Show more


I agree.. the first answer that came to mind is E what is the OA?
User avatar
ioiio
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 May 2008
Posts: 246
Own Kudos:
12
Posts: 246
Kudos: 12
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing 27 Jul 2007, 22:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dahcrap
I didnt like C because I didnt feel advocates for is a good idiom. Didnt sound good to my ears
Show more


quite relevant


When they are acting as advocates for a cause, people often say they are “advocating for”—say, traffic safety. This is not as widely accepted as “campaigning for” or “working toward.” Saying you are “advocating for the blind” leaves a lot of listeners wondering what it is you advocate for them. If you can substitute “advocate” for “advocate for,” you should do so: “I advocate for higher pay for teachers” becomes “I advocate higher pay for teachers.”
User avatar
b14kumar
User avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Last visit: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 297
Own Kudos:
431
Posts: 297
Kudos: 431
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing 01 Aug 2007, 21:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is E.

'argue for' is the correct idiom. C is a close one.
But, "advocate for" is not idiomatic.

We should use "advocate" alone.

Regards,
Brajesh
User avatar
success4sure
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2007
Last visit: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
9
Posts: 14
Kudos: 9
In 1805 Lecotia Mott published Discourse on Women, arguing 01 Aug 2007, 21:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E,

Question of Parallelism
a treatise arguing for ... and for...

Also,E is better than D as D changes the meaning from arguing to advocating..



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
506 posts
bhanu29
361 posts