Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 May 2009
Posts: 143
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT Date: 03222013
GPA: 3.57
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Feb 2013, 18:25
Question Stats:
49% (02:26) correct 51% (02:28) wrong based on 325 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same? (A) 100% increase (B) 50% increase (C) 30% increase (D) 30% decrease (E) 50% decrease Source: Gmat Hacks 1800
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________




Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9803
Location: Pune, India

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Feb 2013, 21:50
megafan wrote: In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?
(A) 100% increase
(B) 50% increase
(C) 30% increase
(D) 30% decrease
(E) 50% decrease
Source: Gmat Hacks 1800 I am discussing direct and inverse variation on my blog nowadays. http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2013/01 ... directly/http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2013/02 ... inversely/Next post will discuss a similar question using both. I have tried to show every step here to avoid confusion but on the blog, I am going to be more direct. By the way, the question is not very GMATlike. \(x = ky^2\) (x is directly proportional to y^2. k is any constant) \(xz = k\) (I am assuming that indirectly is actually inversely proportional) Both together, \(\frac{xz}{y^2} = k\) (Assume z to be constant, you get x is directly proportional to y^2. Assume y to be constant, you get x is inversely proportional to z) \(\frac{x_1*z_1}{(y_1)^2} = \frac{x_2*z_2}{(y_2)^2}\) Given that \(z_2 = (\frac{1}{2})z_1\) and that \(x_1\)should be equal to \(x_2\). What is the relation between \(y_1\) and \(y_2\)? \(\frac{x_1*z_1}{(y_1)^2} = \frac{x_1*(1/2)z_1}{(y_2)^2}\) \((y_2)^2 = \frac{(y_1)^2}{2}\) \(y_2 = \frac{y_1}{\sqrt{2}}\) \(y_2 = \frac{y_1*\sqrt{2}}{2}\) \(y_2 = 0.7*y_1\) (A decrease of 30%) Answer (D)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >




Director
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 990
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Feb 2013, 21:58
megafan wrote: In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?
(A) 100% increase
(B) 50% increase
(C) 30% increase
(D) 30% decrease
(E) 50% decrease
Source: Gmat Hacks 1800 The entire expression can be written in the form \(x=k*y^2/z\). When z is halved, the expression becomes \(x=2k*y^2/z\). In order to make this expression equal to its initial form, we need to divide this expression by 2. This can be done by reducing \(y\) to \(y/\sqrt{2}\). Therefore percent change= \(yy/1.414\)=>\(0.414y/1.414\). This is almost equal to 30%. Hope this helps.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59268

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Feb 2013, 00:34
megafan wrote: In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?
(A) 100% increase
(B) 50% increase
(C) 30% increase
(D) 30% decrease
(E) 50% decrease
Source: Gmat Hacks 1800 Original question from GMAT Prep: Quote: The rate of a certain chemical reaction is directly proportional to the square of the concentration of chemical A present and inversely proportional to the concentration of chemical B present. If the concentration of chemical B is increased by 100 percent, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the concentration of chemical A required to keep the reaction rate unchanged?
A. 100% decrease B. 50% decrease C. 40% decrease D. 40% increase E. 50% increase Discussed here: therateofacertainchemicalreactionisdirectly90119.html (I guess many Gmat Hacks questions are just reworded problems from GMAT Prep).
_________________



Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3419

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Bunuel wrote: megafan wrote: In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?
(A) 100% increase
(B) 50% increase
(C) 30% increase
(D) 30% decrease
(E) 50% decrease
Source: Gmat Hacks 1800 Original question from GMAT Prep: Quote: The rate of a certain chemical reaction is directly proportional to the square of the concentration of chemical A present and inversely proportional to the concentration of chemical B present. If the concentration of chemical B is increased by 100 percent, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the concentration of chemical A required to keep the reaction rate unchanged?
A. 100% decrease B. 50% decrease C. 40% decrease D. 40% increase E. 50% increase Discussed here: therateofacertainchemicalreactionisdirectly90119.html (I guess many Gmat Hacks questions are just reworded problems from GMAT Prep). you are correct ........
_________________



Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 103
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.9
WE: Marketing (Other)

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Feb 2013, 23:44
Normally i plug numbers to see what happens if certain change applies, i am not sure whether i am doing correct but please comment if anything wrong in my method: Let say the efficiency index y=10 and investment index=1, so, per question terms, production index x=y^2/x=10^2/1=100; now we change the investment index to half (i assumed that it has been decreased to half since it is not clear in the question) and we have the following: 100=y^2/0.5=(y^2)*2=100 > y=\sqrt{50} > equals to about 7, then we can see that efficiency index should be reduced to approximately 30% (from 10 to 7). I hope that my way of thinking is correct.
_________________
If you found my post useful and/or interesting  you are welcome to give kudos!



Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 143
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
WE: Business Development (Internet and New Media)

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Apr 2013, 01:59
Marcab wrote: The entire expression can be written in the form \(x=k*y^2/z\). When z is halved, the expression becomes \(x=2k*y^2/z\). In order to make this expression equal to its initial form, we need to divide this expression by 2. This can be done by reducing \(y\) to \(y/\sqrt{2}\). Therefore percent change= \(yy/1.414\)=>\(0.414y/1.414\). This is almost equal to 30%. Hope this helps. I used the same method but skipped the calculations since you know that since z is being halved y also has to decrease. There are only 2 options that decrease. If i plug in 50, the condition isn't met and hence 30 is the answer. You should be able to deduce this in less than 30 secs.
_________________
You've been walking the ocean's edge, holding up your robes to keep them dry. You must dive naked under, and deeper under, a thousand times deeper!  Rumi
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index.php/author/cbermanmanhattanprepcom/  This is worth its weight in gold
Economist GMAT Test  730, Q50, V41 Aug 9th, 2013 Manhattan GMAT Test  670, Q45, V36 Aug 11th, 2013 Manhattan GMAT Test  680, Q47, V36 Aug 17th, 2013 GmatPrep CAT 1  770, Q50, V44 Aug 24th, 2013 Manhattan GMAT Test  690, Q45, V39 Aug 30th, 2013 Manhattan GMAT Test  710, Q48, V39 Sep 13th, 2013 GmatPrep CAT 2  740, Q49, V41 Oct 6th, 2013
GMAT  770, Q50, V44, Oct 7th, 2013 My Debrief  http://gmatclub.com/forum/fromtheashesthoushallrise770q50v44awa5ir162299.html#p1284542



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 8484
Location: United States (CA)

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jul 2018, 20:01
megafan wrote: In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?
(A) 100% increase
(B) 50% increase
(C) 30% increase
(D) 30% decrease
(E) 50% decrease “Production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z” means x = k * y^2/z for some positive value k. Now we are given that z becomes z/2 and we can let y become ty for some positive value t. So we have x = k * (ty)^2/(z/2). Since we are keeping x the same and recall that x = k * y^2/z, so we have: k * y^2/z = k * (ty)^2/(z/2) y^2/z = t^2 * y^2 * 2/z 1 = t^2 * 2 1/2 = t^2 t = √(1/2) ≈ 0.7 Thus we see that the efficiency index y has to become 0.7y, or a 30% decrease, in order to keep the production index x the same. Answer: D
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.



Intern
Joined: 16 Jan 2017
Posts: 2

Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Sep 2018, 08:46
ScottTargetTestPrep wrote: megafan wrote: In a certain industry, production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z. If a business in this industry halves its investment index, which of the following is closest to the percent change in the business’s efficiency index required to keep the production index the same?
(A) 100% increase
(B) 50% increase
(C) 30% increase
(D) 30% decrease
(E) 50% decrease “Production index x is directly proportional to the square of efficiency index y, and indirectly proportional to investment index z” means x = k * y^2/z for some positive value k. Now we are given that z becomes z/2 and we can let y become ty for some positive value t. So we have x = k * (ty)^2/(z/2). Since we are keeping x the same and recall that x = k * y^2/z, so we have: k * y^2/z = k * (ty)^2/(z/2) y^2/z = t^2 * y^2 * 2/z 1 = t^2 * 2 1/2 = t^2 t = √(1/2) ≈ 0.7 Thus we see that the efficiency index y has to become 0.7y, or a 30% decrease, in order to keep the production index x the same. Answer: D how to easily know that 't = √(1/2) ≈ 0.7' please?




Re: In a certain industry, production index x is directly propor
[#permalink]
12 Sep 2018, 08:46






