GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Feb 2019, 16:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT RC Webinar

     February 23, 2019

     February 23, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     February 24, 2019

     February 24, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 183
In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 10:39
1
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

51% (02:15) correct 49% (02:31) wrong based on 118 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants cooked dishes made from recipes that have been in their families for generations. The cake that won the competition was made from a recipe that head-chef Pierre Limore claims has been in his family for three generations since the 1940s. Although the sous-chef who actually baked the winning dish used an ingredient that has only recently become popular in the baking industry, around the late 1920s the same ingredient had been commonly used by chefs before it was temporarily declared unfit for human consumption.

Which of the following can be concluded on the basis of the information given above?

(A)The sous-chef who baked the cake was aware of the fact that the use of the specific ingredient would not violate the rules of the competition.
(B)Had the head-chef Pierre Limore notified the authorities holding the competition of the list of ingredients, it is highly unlikely that his dish would have won the competition
(C)The use of the recipe used to bake the winning dish does not belie the claim made by the head-chef
(D)The authorities holding the competition had a mechanism to verify whether the recipes used in baking the dishes in the competition matched the original recipes first used to make the dishes.
(E)To ensure that such competitions are fairly conducted, only chefs who can exactly replicate the original dish should be allowed to participate.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Posts: 250
CAT Tests
In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 11:28
In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants cooked dishes made from recipes that have been in their families for generations. The cake that won the competition was made from a recipe that head-chef Pierre Limore claims has been in his family for three generations since the 1940s. Although the sous-chef who actually baked the winning dish used an ingredient that has only recently become popular in the baking industry, around the late 1920s the same ingredient had been commonly used by chefs before it was temporarily declared unfit for human consumption.

Which of the following can be concluded on the basis of the information given above?

(A)The sous-chef who baked the cake was aware of the fact that the use of the specific ingredient would not violate the rules of the competition.(No information regarding rules)
(B)Had the head-chef Pierre Limore notified the authorities holding the competition of the list of ingredients, it is highly unlikely that his dish would have won the competition(we can not conclude on the basis of given information)
(C)The use of the recipe used to bake the winning dish does not belie the claim made by the head-chef(Contender)
(D)The authorities holding the competition had a mechanism to verify whether the recipes used in baking the dishes in the competition matched the original recipes first used to make the dishes.(mechanism are out of scope)
(E)To ensure that such competitions are fairly conducted, only chefs who can exactly replicate the original dish should be allowed to participate.(out of scope)


Choice C is correct

Thanks
_________________

IMPOSSIBLE IS JUST AN OPINION

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Aug 2018
Posts: 21
CAT Tests
In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 21:34
Option C -

If the competition was based on usiage of recipies passed on through generations, then that ingredient should not have been the part of the recipie and the cake wouldn't have won the competition.

Option B -

On the other hand the head chef was unaware of sound chef using that ingredient, so head chef's claim wouldn't have belie his belief.

What am I overlooking, can an expert please help.

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma

chetan2u

Thanks
Saurabh

Posted from my mobile device
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7334
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2018, 22:17
1
Sarjaria84 wrote:
Option C -

If the competition was based on usiage of recipies passed on through generations, then that ingredient should not have been the part of the recipie and the cake wouldn't have won the competition.

Option B -

On the other hand the head chef was unaware of sound chef using that ingredient, so head chef's claim wouldn't have belie his belief.

What am I overlooking, can an expert please help.

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma

chetan2u

Thanks
Saurabh

Posted from my mobile device


Hi..

you are taking temporarily out as permanent..
head chef X"s family used the ingredient in a cake recipe- the ingredient was temporarily banned- ingredient again came into use- competition was held - head chef X wins and claims it has been passed from generations - the second in command says he used that specific ingredient -
Headchef"s claim is strengthened

So even if the ingredients were mentioned, X would have still won. After all it is not banned now.

so C
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html
4) Base while finding % increase and % decrease : https://gmatclub.com/forum/percentage-increase-decrease-what-should-be-the-denominator-287528.html


GMAT Expert

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
D
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8895
Location: Pune, India
Re: In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2018, 02:32
1
Probus wrote:
In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants cooked dishes made from recipes that have been in their families for generations. The cake that won the competition was made from a recipe that head-chef Pierre Limore claims has been in his family for three generations since the 1940s. Although the sous-chef who actually baked the winning dish used an ingredient that has only recently become popular in the baking industry, around the late 1920s the same ingredient had been commonly used by chefs before it was temporarily declared unfit for human consumption.

Which of the following can be concluded on the basis of the information given above?

(A)The sous-chef who baked the cake was aware of the fact that the use of the specific ingredient would not violate the rules of the competition.
(B)Had the head-chef Pierre Limore notified the authorities holding the competition of the list of ingredients, it is highly unlikely that his dish would have won the competition
(C)The use of the recipe used to bake the winning dish does not belie the claim made by the head-chef
(D)The authorities holding the competition had a mechanism to verify whether the recipes used in baking the dishes in the competition matched the original recipes first used to make the dishes.
(E)To ensure that such competitions are fairly conducted, only chefs who can exactly replicate the original dish should be allowed to participate.



Family-owned restaurants cooked dishes made from recipes that have been in their families for generations.
Cake that won was from recipe of head-chef Limore who says it has been in his family for 3 gens (since 1940s)
Sous chef (second in command) who actually baked it used an ingredient popular again - it was popular in 1920s before being temporarily banned.

(A)The sous-chef who baked the cake was aware of the fact that the use of the specific ingredient would not violate the rules of the competition.
The ingredient is popular again. It was banned temporarily. Obviously, the ban has been removed now. Additionally, we don't know whether the sous chef was aware of all this or not.

(B)Had the head-chef Pierre Limore notified the authorities holding the competition of the list of ingredients, it is highly unlikely that his dish would have won the competition
The ingredient is popular again. It was banned temporarily. Obviously, the ban has been removed now. There is no reason the ingredient would change the suitability of the dish.

(C)The use of the recipe used to bake the winning dish does not belie the claim made by the head-chef
The ingredient was popular in 1920s before being banned (we don't know when it was banned). The recipe has been in his family since 1940s. It is certainly possible that the ingredient was used in 1940s. So the use of the recipe does not contradict the claim of the head chef. This is correct.

(D)The authorities holding the competition had a mechanism to verify whether the recipes used in baking the dishes in the competition matched the original recipes first used to make the dishes.
The argument doesn't tell us this.

(E)To ensure that such competitions are fairly conducted, only chefs who can exactly replicate the original dish should be allowed to participate.[/quote]
We are not looking for an opinion (use of "should"). We are looking for what we can conclude from the argument.

Answer (C)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants   [#permalink] 11 Oct 2018, 02:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a cooking competition, various family-owned restaurants

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.