In a crowded, acquisitive world, the disappearance of lifestyles such as those once followed by southern Africa's Bushman and Australia's aborigines,
requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods, seem inevitably doomed.I have stricken down "such as..aborigines" because they're examples
Should be
seems because we're talking about "the disappearance of something" so can eliminate A, C and D
(A) In a crowded, acquisitive world, the disappearance of lifestyles
such as those once followed by southern Africa's Bushman and Australia's aborigines, requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods,
seem inevitably doomed.
(C) In a crowded, acquisitive world, the disappearance of lifestyles
such as those once followed by southern Africa's Bushman and Australia's aborigines, which require vast wild spaces and permit little accumulation of goods,
seem to be inevitably doomed
(D) In a crowded, acquisitive world, the disappearance of lifestyles
such as those once followed by southern Africa's Bushman and Australia's aborigines, life-styles that require vast wild spaces and permit little accumulation of goods,
seem inevitable
We can see between B and E, the sentence should mean:
the disappearance of lifestyles seems inevitable not
the disappearance of lifestyles seems to be inevitably doomed. there is a slight rhetorical meaning here in the second. Hence E
(B) In a crowded, acquisitive world, the disappearance of lifestyles
such as those once followed by southern Africa's Bushman and Australia's aborigines, requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods, seems to be inevitably doomed
(E) In a crowded, acquisitive world, the disappearance of lifestyles
such as those once followed by southern Africa's Bushman and Australia's aborigines, life-styles requiring vast wild spaces and permitting little accumulation of goods, seems inevitable