Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 08:35 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 08:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,545
 [13]
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
RonPurewal
Joined: 15 Nov 2013
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
1,121
 [9]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT Focus 1: 805 Q90 V90 DI90
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 805 Q90 V90 DI90
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 120
Kudos: 1,121
 [9]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Pranavsawant
Joined: 20 Jun 2025
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 316
Products:
Posts: 87
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Pray2K
Joined: 01 Jan 2025
Last visit: 19 Sep 2025
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 23
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) It provides support for the explanation of a particular phenomenon. The bold statement indeed supports the doctor's theory of mosquito causing malaria.

(B) It presents evidence that contradicts an established fact. - Nothing contradictory is presented.

(C) It offers confirmation of a contested assumption. - No assumption mentioned. Even if we consider the statement of "gas" as an assumption, the confirmation is against that assumption.

(D) It identifies the cause of an erroneous conclusion. - No cause is identified. Nothing is mentioned regarding erroneous conclusion.

(E) It proposes a new conclusion in place of an earlier conjecture. - Remember we have to think only about the bold statement. It definitely does not propose a new conclusion.

Other options were negated and were away from the main scope.
User avatar
NIKAM
Joined: 20 Sep 2025
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But it is not supporting the statement in anyways , it is mentioned that people from Hong kong used to believe this Xis reason was the cause of contagious disease . The next statement says that dcotor has determined the tangible reason fot the cause . Please Explain !
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,545
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
In an attempt to explain the cause of malaria, a deadly infectious disease, early European settlers in Hong Kong attributed the malady to poisonous gases supposedly emanating from low-lying swampland. In the 1880s, however, doctors determined that Anopheles mosquitoes were responsible for transmitting the disease to humans after observing that the female of the species can carry a parasitic protozoan that is passed on to unsuspecting humans when a mosquito feasts on a person's blood.

What function does the statement in boldface fulfill with respect to the argument presented above?


(A) It provides support for the explanation of a particular phenomenon.

(B) It presents evidence that contradicts an established fact.

(C) It offers confirmation of a contested assumption.

(D) It identifies the cause of an erroneous conclusion.

(E) It proposes a new conclusion in place of an earlier conjecture.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



(A) It provides support for the explanation of a particular phenomenon.


This is the correct answer.

(B) It presents evidence which contradicts an established fact.


This doesn't fit into one o f the standard trap categories. The boldface text does contradict what people once thought about malaria, but what they once thought was not an established fact.

(C) It offers confirmation of a contested assumption.


This is a “one word off" trap— nothing was contested in the argument

(D) It identifies the cause of an erroneous conclusion.


This could be a Reverse Logic trap; we're looking for something that supports the conclusion.

(E) It proposes a new conclusion in place of an earlier conjecture.


This is a general Mix-Up answer; the argument does do this in general, but not the statement in boldface.
User avatar
CareerLauncherMBA
Joined: 08 Jan 2024
Last visit: 13 Oct 2025
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
On behalf of Career Launcher, we suggest that:-
The answer is Option(A).
It lends support to the explanation of one of the phenomena. Reasoning The argument begins with the early settlers' incorrect belief that malaria was caused by poisonous gases, but then shows that doctors in the 1880s demonstrated that malaria is transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes. The statements in boldface constitute the specific observation that female Anopheles mosquitoes carry the parasitic protozoan, which they pass to humans while blood feeding. That observation supports and therefore provides evidence for the explanation that mosquitoes transmit malaria.
Why the other choices are not correct (B) is incorrect because the statement is evidence that supports a new explanation, rather than evidence that contradicts a fact.(C) is incorrect because the assumption about mosquito transmission was challenged, but the statement does not commit the same explanation; it is providing empirical support.(D) is incorrect because it does not identify the cause of the previous error; it only supports the new scientific explanation.(E) is incorrect because it does not introduce a new conclusion; it supports the established new explanation.
💡 Curious how you’d score on the GMAT? Take our FREE Diagnostic Test today and see where you stand! Get instant feedback and expert tips. Start here: https://2ly.link/2Alsw
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts