harsh8686
harsh8686
In Dickens’s fiction, the nuanced humor and disturbing representation of social realities has received critical acclaim over the years.
A) In Dickens’s fiction, the nuanced humor and disturbing representation of social realities has
B) Dickens’s fiction, with its nuanced humor and disturbing representation of social realities, have
C) The nuanced humor and social realities’ disturbing representation in Dickens’s fiction have
D) The nuanced humor, along with disturbing representation of social realities in Dickens’s fiction, has
E) The nuanced humor and disturbing representation of social realities in Dickens’s fiction have
Hi
EMPOWERgmatVerbalMy question is not about which option is correct rather about parallelism. When I saw this question, I first thought that its a replica of
OG18 question 782. However, to my dismay, it wasn't so. Anyways, I am still not clear whether in the option choice E, the usage of the prepositional phrase — "in DIckens's fiction" — is correct.
The structure of the option E is [Noun] and {Noun] [prepositional phrase - in Dicken's fiction] [verb]. However, that of choice A is [prepositional phrase - in Dicken's fiction], [Noun A] and [Noun B] [verb]. I want to know which one is more unambiguous. Initially, I was little leery to pick E because I thought that maybe it's ambiguous but using POE, I narrowed down to E. Can you please help me with this conundrum.
Thanks for the question
harsh8686!
Since you want to focus on the differences between A & E, let's start there. From a grammar standpoint, the only main problem with option A is the subject/verb agreement issue (uses a singular "has received" for the plural subject "the nuanced humor and disturbing representation of social realities"). While there isn't technically any problem with placing the prepositional phrase "In Dickens's fiction" in either spot, I do have a preference when it comes to ambiguity:
A)
In Dickens’s fiction, the nuanced humor and disturbing representation of social realities
has received critical acclaim over the years.
If I were told to choose between these two options, I wouldn't choose this one. Why? Because placing the phrase "In Dickens's fiction" at the beginning and ending it with a comma, you've now told writers that this is non-essential information. I would argue that it absolutely is! If I took that part of the sentence out, we now don't know WHAT the nuanced humor and disturbing representation of social realities belongs to. I think this would be the more problematic sentence because it removes important context.
E) The nuanced humor and disturbing representation of social realities
in Dickens’s fiction have received critical acclaim over the years.
By not using commas to off-set this prepositional phrase, we are forced to include it as essential information - which it is! There is not problem with the reader thinking this information is "optional," and it gives us the context we need for the rest of the sentence to make sense.
I hope that helps!
Also - we have started up the kudos contest again, so feel free to check that out
HERE if you'd like to participate again!