It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 18:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2011
Posts: 201

Kudos [?]: 125 [1], given: 93

Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.2
WE: Accounting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2015, 03:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:20) correct 35% (01:13) wrong based on 452 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The question is from Kaplan CAT, avoid if you didn't finish them all.

In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universities spend too much time publishing and not enough time educating their students, some of these schools are propagating rules that set strict limits on the amount of material that a full-time professor may publish over a certain time period. This policy will come back to haunt these schools because, faced with the loss of any outside income, many excellent prospective candidates will opt not to accept fulltime positions, which will lead to a shortage of qualified full-time professors.

The author's conclusion logically depends on which of the following?

    A Universities generally receive a large percentage of the royalties from works published by their full-time professors.
    B Most professors do not allow their outside work to infringe on time that should be spent on classroom preparation and teaching.
    C Restrictions on outside publishing do not apply to part-time or adjunct professors.
    D Publishing is the significant source of outside income for full-time professors.
    E All professors at prestigious universities currently publish more material than is permitted under the new rules.

The reason I decided to post this is because:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA is D, but "SIGNIFICANT" in D and "ANY" in question stem do not match. Even if publishing is not significant source of outside income, professors will still opt not to accept fulltime positions because the loss of ANY outside income will affect them, even if it was insignificant in the first place. Please advise
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Stay positive! ^.^


My blog - http://www.mbafortech.com

Kudos [?]: 125 [1], given: 93

Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesOptimus Prep Discount CodesEMPOWERgmat Discount Codes
Queens MBA Thread Master
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 193

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 45

Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Re: In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2015, 04:59
Publication -> Less time for teaching
Hence restrict number of publication,
Restriction -> Les income -> less professor

Possible assumption (Pre thinking)
1. Publication has major share in so called outside income.



A Universities generally receive a large percentage of the royalties from works published by their full-time professors.
Analysis : It talks about universities earning, not professor. It does not matter to professor how much uni earns, Hence Out of scope.

B Most professors do not allow their outside work to infringe on time that should be spent on classroom preparation and teaching.
Analysis : This does not seems to support argument at all. Basis of argument is, Outside work results into less time. This talks entirely opposite.
Wrong option


C Restrictions on outside publishing do not apply to part-time or adjunct professors.
Analysis : It talks about partimers not full time professor. Argument is mainly concerned about full time positions. Can be marked out of scope.

D Publishing is the significant source of outside income for full-time professors.
Analysis : Matches Pre thought assumption : Let's negate, "Publishing is not the significant" Hence restriction won't be big demotivating factor for full time position. Breaks the argument.

E All professors at prestigious universities currently publish more material than is permitted under the new rules.
Analysis : Fact, nice to know. It may happen that not all professor publish more than permitted but 99% publish more than permitted. So negation does not break my argument. Hence cannot be correct.


Answer : Option D

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 45

2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1199

Kudos [?]: 909 [2], given: 75

Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2015, 07:23
2
This post received
KUDOS
professors at many prestigious universities spend too much time publishing and not enough time educating their students

Assumption1 of school: If the professors are told to reduce the amount of publishing material, then they will spend enough time for student education.
Assumption2 of school: The professors may not go against the schools.


Therefore for action, some schools are propagating rules to set strict limits on the amount of material that a full-time professor may publish over a certain time period.

But this policy will harm these schools because,

professors will lose the outside income and refuse to accept full-time positions.

(The Income is so high that they reject their full time jobs. Otherwise it wont make sense.)

This action will lead to a shortage of qualified full-time professors as university will lose good professors.

The author's conclusion logically depends on which of the following?

    A Universities generally receive a large percentage of the royalties from works published by their full-time professors.
    Even whether universities will or will not receive, they can still imply the restriction for the sake of reputation of school and professors may or may not quit. This gives no info that can be assumed.)

    B Most professors do not allow their outside work to infringe on time that should be spent on classroom preparation and teaching. This is opposite of conclusion.

    C Restrictions on outside publishing do not apply to part-time or adjunct professors.(Out of scope. I selected this answer both the times I have gone through it. But now I realize that professors refuse to accept full-time positions and Nowhere he says that if they don't accept full time then they will accept part time jobs.)

    D Publishing is the significant source of outside income for full-time professors.
    (This is inline with our reasoning above and is the reason professors are ready to even leave the jobs for publishing their work.)

    E All professors at prestigious universities currently publish more material than is permitted under the new rules.
This can be true and close to the argument but ALL ruins it. What if few members don't, then also on average the scenario may not affect. Negation of this statement is not going to break the argument.)

Now coming to you, vishwaprakash

Quote:
The reason I decided to post this is because:
OA is D, but "SIGNIFICANT" in D and "ANY" in question stem do not match. Even if publishing is not significant source of outside income, professors will still opt not to accept full-time positions because the loss of ANY outside income will affect them, even if it was insignificant in the first place. Please advise.


Yes, you are right. But if the any income is not big enough, will they lose their jobs of prestigious school salaries. If they are not bothered about money and focused on their research and publishing , then that will weaken the conclusion.
I hope this helps :)
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Kudos [?]: 909 [2], given: 75

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2013
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 75

GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2015, 06:57
kvazar

I agree on your concerns. We have to bring additional assumptions to create the primary one.
In the argument, the author does not even mention anything in regards to income, economic concerns etc.

Correct me pls, if I am wrong.
_________________

Please kindly click on "+1 Kudos", if you think my post is useful

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 75

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10207

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2017, 03:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 74

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.32
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Nov 2017, 05:49
Another truly awful question by Kaplan. To the person who posted this question, you are 100% correct that the question is faulty because of the phrase 'any loss of income'. D does not have our conclusion fall apart, for even the loss of a $1 would force the Professor to quit. We are talking about 'outside' income, and we do not care about the Professor's salary, which is out of scope for this question.

To everyone who thinks D is not correct, you have my support that it is, indeed, not a viable answer for an assumption question.
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 74

Re: In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti   [#permalink] 06 Nov 2017, 05:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In response to concerns that professors at many prestigious universiti

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.