akshaykotha
sa18
nusmavrik
Premises -
P1 Old theory - prehistoric humans must have labored incessantly for their very survival
P2 New theory - Mbuti did not labored hard. The implication is that the short workday is not peculiar to industrialized societies.
Conclusion - conclusion is drawn from studying Mbuti - workdays are products of different stages of the continuing process of industrialization.
A The stimulus talks about workdays being the product of industralization. How the economy of Mbuti is affected by encroachment of modern civilization has no bearing !
B To draw any conclusion from studying Mbuti about the prehistoric human we must assume that their lifestyles must be similar. Answer
C The distinction b/n work activities and leisure activities has no bearing.
D workday of a European peasant. No bearing
E workday of Shaklik tribe in central Asia. No bearing
The old theory says that prehitoric humans laboured hard while new theory says Mbuti did not labour hard.
Then how can the lifestyle of Mbuti and prehistoric human be same?
Using same logic, I have eliminated B.
My 2 cents,
In the argument it's stated that based on the shortening of average work hours from 12 to below 8 many people
assume that this has been the trend throughout history. The argument then goes on to refute this assumption by using counter premise indicator - "
However, a study of primitive peoples of today suggests a different conclusion. The Mbuti of central Africa, for instance, spend only a few hours each day in hunting, gathering, and tending to other economic necessities. The rest of their time is spent as they choose."
If we can link these primitive Mbuti people with prehistoric people about whom many people assume that because of the above mentioned trend their working hours would have been incessant, then we will be able to refute the assumption made by
many people. Please keep in mind that this is not the argument's assumption and argument is in fact refuting this assumption.
Point 'B' makes this link.
Point 'D' says medieval times, different from pre historic times plus there's no mention of European peasants in the argument.
Point 'E' similarly says something about Shalik tribe, again no mention of it in the original argument and in what time it's being referred to.
Hope this helped !
Thanks
Saurabh