It is currently 21 Nov 2017, 19:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 18:38
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent on treating disease X went to pay for standard methods of treatment, which are known to be effective though they are expensive and painful. An increasing percentage is being spent on nonstandard treatments, which cause little discomfort. Unfortunately, the nonstandard treatments have proved to be ineffective. Obviously, less money is being spent on effective treatments of disease X than was spent ten years ago.

Which one of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion above to be properly drawn?

(A) Varieties of disease X requiring expensive special treatment have become less common during the past decade.

(B) Nonstandard methods of treating disease X are more expensive now than they were a decade ago.

(C) Of total medical expenditures, the percentage that is due to treatment of disease X increased during the past decade.

(D) Most of the money spent on treating disease X during the last decade went to pay for nonstandard treatments.

(E) The total amount of money spent on treating disease X slowly declined during the past decade.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2006, 21:40
anyone wanna try?

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Location: Madrid
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 00:50
D for me on this one
less money is being spent on effective treatments of disease X than was spent ten years ago

decreasing percentage of money spent on treating disease X went to pay for standard methods of treatment, which are known to be effective though they are expensive and painful. An increasing percentage is being spent on nonstandard treatments, which cause little discomfort.
on the first sight the information is sufficientm but we don't know
what was the ratio of money spendings for traditional med to money spendings for notraditional medicine.
For example if the ratio was 90 to 10 , and after increasing investments in notraditional medicine it became 60 to 40 than coclusion is wrong.
So I think D it is because it gives us information about money sharing between trad med abd notrad medicine
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 398

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 00:55
Going with B

In the argument.. both standard and non-standard treatments saw increase in spending, yet the author says " less money is being spent on effective treatments of disease X than was spent ten years ago."

This implies that the cost of non-standard treatments has gone up.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 01:45
I'm going with E on this one.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 02:12
Going for (E) here
_________________

A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 03:31
I'll go for D here...

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 290

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Location: USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 06:14
Going with D

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 577

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Location: France
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2006, 06:39
(1)decreasing percentage money for effective treatment
(2)increasing % for uneffective treatment
(conclusion) less money for (1)

To draw the conclusion correctly, we have to say that the total amount hasn't increase. In such case, the amount of money cd have increase. (E) it is.

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 208 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2006, 15:22
I'll vote for (E) ... OA please ...
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 208 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2006, 15:26
OA is E here..

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2006, 18:18
karlfurt wrote:
(1)decreasing percentage money for effective treatment
(2)increasing % for uneffective treatment
(conclusion) less money for (1)

To draw the conclusion correctly, we have to say that the total amount hasn't increase. In such case, the amount of money cd have increase. (E) it is.

Brilliant analysis Karl !
I fell for the trap and chose (D).
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2006, 00:04
karlfurt wrote:
(1)decreasing percentage money for effective treatment
(2)increasing % for uneffective treatment
(conclusion) less money for (1)

To draw the conclusion correctly, we have to say that the total amount hasn't increase. In such case, the amount of money cd have increase. (E) it is.


Nice on Karl! I also fell for the D trap, but (E) makes sense after reading your explanation.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 700

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2006, 09:03
Late But E.

Decreasing percentage of money spent on X in the past decade ...

The money spent on X does not increase .....

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 361

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2006, 22:18
Can you please post the OE?

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2006, 00:26
E does not make logical sense. We are talking about money allocation not about the amount of money. Money is being allocated to "nontraditional" not "ineffective" treatment. It is believed that traditional treatment is more effective than nontraditional treatment, but the money is still being spent on this disease.

I go with D

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2006, 00:31
Now that I reread the paragraph, I actually believe that no one single answer is correct. D (which I believed was right) makes too broad of a statement (most money) we do not know the actual allocation.

A decreasing precentage of money, does not actually mean less money. We have to know more about the moving parts to deduce this. This is why I cannot agree with E.

A,B,C also make assumptions not answered in the statement above.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2006, 03:08
Late reply...E is the answer..
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 04 Sep 2006, 03:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.